MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6968682847 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5099466

Synalpheus apioceros Coutiere 1909

2012· article· en· W6968682847 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaxonomy (biology)Nova scotiaIndian oceanLife history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Synalpheus apioceros Coutière, 1909 Synalpheus apioceros Coutière, 1909: 27, fig. 9. Material examined. 2 f, 2 ni, 07.III.2008, Santa Cruz Cabrália, mouth of João de Tiba River (sandstone reef), MZUESC 1152; 1 f, 28.VIII.2007, Caravelas, Caravelas River, Farol Abrolhos Iate Clube, St. 2, MZUESC 988; 62 ni, 28.VIII.2007, Caravelas, Caravelas River, St. 1, MZUESC 1088; 2 f, 8 ni, 19.III.2007, Nova Viçosa, Pontal da Barra Beach, St. 3, MZUESC 830. Distribution. Western Atlantic—southern Florida to Suriname, western Gulf of Mexico and Brazil (seamounts of North Brazilian Chain, Amapá to Santa Catarina) (Chace 1972; Christoffersen 1998; Coelho Filho 2006). Ecological notes. In the intertidal, on reefs, under rocks and wood, and on jetties (on octocorals and among barnacles). Salinity range: 31–37 psu. Previous records. Synalpheus cf. apioceros — Almeida et al. (2007b), Camamu Bay. Remarks. Synalpheus apioceros is morphologically somewhat variable and may require a taxonomic revision based on both morphology and DNA (A. Anker, pers. comm.). The material from Bahia matches the description of S. apioceros in Coutière (1909).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicMarine Biology and Ecology Research→French-language works237,207→