Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tabuda planiceps (Loew) (Fig. 11) Specimens examined (42). BC: Chopaka; Monte Lake; Okanagan Falls, White Lake; Oliver, Ripley Lake; Osoyoos, Mud lake; Osoyoos, Strawberry Creek; Osoyoos Lake, Haynes Lease; Penticton; Vaseux Creek; Vaseux Lake (Fig. 16); Vernon. DEBU, RBCM, SEM. Database and Literature records (24). BC: Chopaka; Grand Forks; Kamloops; Oliver; Osoyoos; Osoyoos, Kruger Mountain; Osoyoos, Richter Pass; Nicola; Okanagan Falls; Penticton; Vaseux Lake; Vaseux Lake, hills to E; Vernon. INHS, SEM. iNaturalist records (14). BC: Bighorn; Columbia Gardens; Keremeos; Osoyoos, Kilpoola Lake area; Osoyoos, Spotted Lake; Osoyoos, Haynes Lease; Spences Bridge (e.g., iNat 121543071, 122086201 (Fig. 11), 139358985, 182376315, 206425359). With its large antennae, the species has a distinctive appearance and is readily identified in the field, which accounts for the significant number of iNaturalist records. Conservation status. BC: S3S4 Distributional notes. In British Columbia, Tabuda is probably restricted to dry grassland and forest habitats in the Thompson-Okanagan and Kootenay regions (Chopaka, Spences Bridge, Columbia Gardens north to Kamloops), where it is probably at the northern limit of its range. Ecoprovinces and other designations. BC: Southern Interior, Southern Interior Mountains. Range. Intermontane. British Columbia south to California, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, and Nebraska (Webb et al. 2013). Biological notes. Flight period: 4 April–24 May. Flight is early; only eight of 68 records are after mid-May and none are later than May. The genus inhabits sandy sites (Irwin & Lyneborg 1980). Records in British Columbia are from mostly lowland sites in sandy grasslands (Purshia tridentata, Artemisia tridentata, Pseudoroegneria spicata habitats) and adjacent open Pinus ponderosa and Pseudotsuga menziesii woods (Fig. 16).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".