MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968706852 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5292332

Omalaspis gibsoni Ros-Farre & Pujade-Villar 2011, n. sp.

2011· article· en· W6968706852 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConstruction Engineering and Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransverse planeOcciputSimple eye in invertebratesDorsumVertex (graph theory)Coronal planeRidge

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Omalaspis gibsoni Ros-Farré & Pujade-Villar n. sp. (Figs 5b & 6b) Type material. (1 ♂). HOLOTYPE male (CNCI), 23-VII-1961, Doolittle Ranch, 9800’ Mt. Evans, COLO (USA), S. M. Clark. Diagnosis. Omalaspis gibsoni n. sp. is morphologically similar to O. asiatica, both having interfoveal line short and narrow, and not well defined. But in O. gibsoni, the scutellar disc is coarsely rugose, without microsculpture, and the scutellar foveae are rounded, while in O. asiatica, the scutellar disc is weakly rugose with noticeable coriaceous microsculpture, and scutellar foveae are laterally oval. Description. Length. Male 2.5 mm; female unknown. Coloration. Head and mesosoma black. Metasoma dark brown. Antenna and leg brown. Wing membrane hyaline, veins of wing brown. Head. Frons coriaceous, slightly rugose. Frontal carinae present, with a furrow between them. Lateral frontal carinae conspicuous, space between them and compound eyes coriaceous and with transverse carinae. Supratorular impression conspicuous. Ocelli slightly prominent. Vertex in dorsal view coriaceous, rugose, with central shiny area. Vertex posterior coriaceous. Occiput coriaceous. Genae sharply margined and expanded, with sinuate transverse carinae, space between carinae shiny and slightly coriaceous. Antenna. Filiform. First flagellomere clearly excavated but not strongly. Antennal formula: 5(2): 1.5(1.5): 5(1.5): 4.5(1.5): 4.5(1.5): 4.5(1.5): 4(1.5): 4(1.5): 3.5(1.5): 3.5(1.5): 3.5(1.5): 3.5(1.5): 3.5(1.5): 5.5(1.5). Mesosoma. Lateral surface of pronotum coriaceous, with very short and scarce transverse carinae dorsally, basally with conspicuous transverse carinae, central area coriaceous. Mesoscutum coarsely coriaceous. Parascutal sulcus shiny. Median ridge complete, conspicuous, antero-admedian lines conspicuous slightly confluent, reaching 1/3 mesoscutal length. Median mesoscutal furrow very deep, coriaceous, with some transverse carinae. Notauli very deep, wide medially, narrow anteriorly and posteriorly, with spaced transverse carinae and coriaceous. Mesosoma, in lateral view, slightly humped. Mesopleuron slightly sculptured anteriorly, smooth posteriorly. Scutellum 0.8 times scutum length. Interfoveal line reaching 1/3 scutellar disc length, strongly sinuate. Scutellar foveae almost smooth. Scutellar disc strongly rugose. Lateral scutellar margin confluent posteriorly, posterior margin of scutellum curved, wide. Wing. Radial cell 2.0 times longer than wide. R2 straight, curved near margin of wing. Distribution. Nearctic, USA (Colorado). Etymology. This new species is dedicated to our Canadian friend and colleague Gary Gibson (CNCI). Biology. Unknown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicConstruction Engineering and SafetyFrench-language works237,207