Lasioglossum (Dialictus) sheffieldi Gibbs 2010
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lasioglossum (Dialictus) sheffieldi Gibbs 2010 (perdifficile group) (New state record) County records: Alger. Notes. Lasioglossum sheffieldi is a sand dune specialist, originally described from coastal areas of the Canadian Maritime Provinces and the western bank of the St. Lawrence River in Quebec (Gibbs 2010b). Two additional specimens, one from a Manitoba dune system and the other from the west coast of Lake Michigan in Wisconsin, were examined but not included as paratypes due to their disjunct localities (Gibbs 2010b). A long series of males and females were recently examined from Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore, which fills an important gap in the known distribution of this species, and points to the likelihood of additional unknown localities in other dune and lakeshore habitats, which may connect the inland populations to the populations on the Atlantic Coast. Material examined. Alger Co.: Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore (PWRC).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".