MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968727131 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3554248

Integrating Research Data Management workflows into Islandora 8x

2019· article· en· W6968727131 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicResearch Data Management Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward Island
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetadataWorkflowIdentifierRDMData managementData management planData integrationLeverage (statistics)Data sharingMetadata managementData publishing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In collaboration with colleagues from Simon Fraser University and the Islandora Foundation, the Robertson Library at UPEI received funding to enhance Islandora 8x to facilitate the creation of a Research Data Management platform. Building on their experience working with research data in Islandora 7x, the group will seek to leverage the new version of Islandora and add functionality that will support the research data lifecycle from planning to publication. The team will present and provide an update on their work on the Islandora 8x RDM platform related to metadata and discovery, data deposit and curation, data privacy and security, persistent identifiers and citability, the use of vocabularies/ontologies and linked data, and data access and analytics. The team will highlight their work on data management planning tools, integration of external identity sources like the Global Research Identifier Data and ORCID, external metadata sources like DataCite and Crossref, external funding sources like the CrossRef Funder Registry, and DOI minters. Likewise, the team will demonstrate external storage methods and support for large datasets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.033
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.176

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0330.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0080.007
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0140.014
Open science0.0040.014
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.364
GPT teacher head0.460
Teacher spread0.097 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicResearch Data Management PracticesFrench-language works237,207