MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968732345 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15103052

Between Swords and Wings: The Fantastic Imaginary and the Valorization of Northeastern Brazilian Childhood in Ana e os piratas do novo mundo

2025· article· en· W6968732345 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature, Culture, and Criticism
Canadian institutionsEducation and Early Childhood Development
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe ImaginaryOralityMythologyIdentity (music)StorytellingSpace (punctuation)Postcolonialism (international relations)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explores the children’s novel Ana e os piratas do novo mundo by Lucas Peixoto Dantas through the lenses of myth criticism, fantastic literature, and childhood pedagogy. Drawing upon archetypal storytelling structures, Catholic symbolism, and the orality of Northeastern Brazilian culture, the study reveals how the novel subverts traditional pirate fiction by centering a female, part-fairy protagonist on a magical journey rooted in regional identity and emotional resilience. Blending theory and literary analysis, the article argues that Dantas’s work not only revitalizes the pirate genre, but also provides meaningful pedagogical tools to affirm childhood as a space of hope, agency, and cultural memory. Keywords: children’s literature, fantasy, pirate fiction, Brazilian Northeast, myth, pedagogy, cultural identity

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.021
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicLiterature, Culture, and CriticismFrench-language works237,207