Bathypogon microdonturus Hull 1958
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bathypogon microdonturus Hull, 1958d: 190. Type. Label data (from Hull 1958d) “ Type. Male. Owieandana, North Flinders Range, collected by Hale and Tindale. Type in the South Australian Museum. ” [Author’s Note: Despite Hull’s comment that he “returned all types”, this holotype is missing. It does not reside in the Australian Museum (Daniels 1978), nor in the Queensland Museum (Daniels 1985, pers. comm., 2004). The Canadian National Collection (CNC) purchased the Frank Hull collection directly from Hull himself and his son Clovis S. Hull. Jeff Cummings (pers. comm.), who is currently in charge of the Hull collection, has informed the author that the holotype of Bathypogon microdonturus was not among the material purchased. Consequently, it is presumed to have been destroyed by “pests” (presumably dermestids); a neotype may need to be assigned when specimens are collected that agree with the type description or topotypes are collected.]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".