MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968743877 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4534275

Nothybus Rondani 1875

2021· article· en· W6968743877 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicColeoptera: Cerambycidae studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlack spotSpotsApex (geometry)WingEyelash

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key to species of Nothybus from China [Simplified from Lonsdale & Marshall (2016)] 1 Distal quarter of wing infuscated, except for 2 discreet circular spots anteriorly in radial cells, and sometimes one ill-defined pale patch in cell m 1 (Figs 7, 25, 34)...................................................................... 2 - Distal quarter of wing with dark brown apical and subapical bands; pale area between bands encompassing three clear spots (Figs 44, 63, 83)...................................................................................... 4 2 Velvety anterolateral patches on frons confluent, black area thus continuous across lower frons (Fig. 4); fore basitarsomere almost entirely white, with basal and distal dark areas no longer than diameter of tarsomere (Fig. 8)............. N. absens - Velvety anterolateral patches on frons separate, black area of lower frons interrupted medially (Figs 22, 31); fore basitarsomere white except for dark apex and base, basal dark area several times longer than diameter of tarsomere (Figs 26, 35)......... 3 3 Abdominal tergites mostly yellowish orange with dark markings posteromedially and along lateral margin (Figs 20, 27, 28)............................................................................................ N. acrobates - Abdominal tergites almost entirely dark brown (Figs 29, 36, 37)...................................... N. biguttatus 4 Subapical clear spots of wing arranged in a straight transverse line; vein CuA 1 with subapical spot usually distinct (Figs 44, 63)................................................................................................. 5 - Subapical clear spots of wing not arranged in a straight line and middle spot in cell r 4+5 displaced apically, subapical spot on vein CuA 1 faded or absent (Fig. 83)................................................................ N. sumatranus 5 Abdominal tergite 3 dark brown (Fig. 46); tergite 4 mostly dark brown, with large orange patches on each side (Figs 46–48); anterior margin of surstylus almost straight (Fig. 76)................................................... N. kempi - Abdominal tergite 3 laterally reddish brown to orange (Fig. 58); tergite 4 almost entirely reddish brown to orange, medial strip and anterior and posterior margins narrowly darkened (Fig. 65); anterior margin of surstylus strongly convex (Fig. 77)........................................................................................... N. kuznetsovorum

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicColeoptera: Cerambycidae studiesFrench-language works237,207