Bibliographic record
Abstract
Family * Psyllidae Latreille, 1807 Comments The monophyly of Psyllidae is well (AN tree) or only moderately (CC tree) supported in the molecular analyses. The two mtg trees share the same internal topology with most clades strongly supported (Fig. 4). The composition of Psyllidae proposed here differs from the Psyllidae of Burckhardt & Ouvrard (2012) in the addition of Diaphorina and Katacephala (from Liviidae, Euphyllurinae) as two distinct, basal clades, though inclusion of Diaphorina in Psyllidae requires further testing (Percy et al. 2018). The molecular analyses further suggest that the subfamily Psyllinae of Burckhardt & Ouvrard (2012) is polyphyletic. Here we remove Amorphicola and Platycorypha and assign them each to a new subfamily. An unnamed taxon from Madagascar, also warranting subfamily status, is not further treated here as it contains no described genus and species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.069 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".