MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6968759821 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4397156

Pantomorus andersoni Lanteri & Rio 2020

2020· article· en· W6968759821 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeSetaDorsumSpermathecaPenis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pantomorus andersoni Lanteri & del Rio, sp. nov. (Figs. 3, 6, 8, 19, 23, 25, 26) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 911EBCD9-FA47-4931-949D-1D1572110958 Type material. Holotype female, 6.5 mm long, glued on a card [Mex: Guerrero / 2-4mi N/ Chilpancingo / VI-241983] [B.K. Dozier] (FSCA). Allotype male, 6 mm long, glued on a card [Mex: Guerrero / 2-4 mi N/ Chilpancingo /24-VI-1983] [B. K. Dozier] (FSCA). Other paratypes: Guerrero: 2-4 mi N Chilpancingo, 24-VI-1983, B.K. Dozier (1♂ FSCA, 1♂ MLP); Mezcala, 3-VI-1946, J & D Pallister (1♀ 1♂ AMNH); 10-12 km E Xochipala, 795-885m, 1748´N 98 25’W, 30-VI-1992, RL Westcott (1♀ CMNC, 1♀ MLP); 9.7 km E Xochipala, 1036m, 5-VII-1987, R Anderson, Acacia cactus woodland (1♂ CMNC); 3 km SE Xalitla, 610m, 1800’N, 9824’W, 16-VII-1992, RL Westcott (1♀ CMNC). Differential diagnosis. The background color of vestiture is usually darker than in P. albosignatus; scales are larger, more appressed, and do not form circles around punctures and setae of the elytra; setae along intervals are denser. Eyes are more protruding; pronotum is slightly truncate conical instead of subcylindrical, more strongly punctate on dorsum, with slightly bisinuate, beveled posterior margin, and posterolateral angles produced, directed outwards; elytra are shorter with respect to the pronotum, punctures of the striae are larger and apical declivity is more abrupt. The collum of the spermatheca is slightly shorter than in P. albosignatus; the spermathecal duct and gland are slightly longer, same as the penis of the males. Description. Holotype female (Figs. 3, 8) 6.5 mm long. Vestiture dense, usually brown with characteristic patter of whitish stripes. Pronotum with five longitudinal stripes, extended along midline (very narrow), dorsum and margins, the latter prolonged on head (below eyes) and elytra (marginal stripes); disc of elytra with three pairs of white maculae, on intervals 3, 3-4, and 2-5, in some specimens confluent with each other and with the marginal stripe, ascending from interval 9 to 6 in the posterior third. Scales rounded, broadly overlapped in the white stripes, and somewhat elongate in the dark- brown background of elytra. Setae on dorsum fine, suberect, shorter and anteriorly directed on head and pronotum, longer and posteriorly directed on elytra, forming 3–4 irregular lines along each interval, longer on apical declivity. Vestiture of venter composed of whitish scales on sides of abdomen and suberect setae. Legs covered with small, round, scattered scales and fine setae. Rostrum strongly truncate-conical (WF/WR 1.55×), as long as wide at apex; lateral carinae feeble. Eye round-ed, strongly protruding; postocular constriction distinct. Antennae short, stout, setose; scape coarse, reaching about 2/3 of eyes; funicle segment 2 ca. 1.5× as long as segment 1, funicle segments 3–7 ca. 1.5× as long as wide at apex, club ca. 2× as long as wide. Pronotum slightly subconical, with curved flanks (WP/LP ca. 1.30×); anterior margin almost straight; sides divergent, slightly curved; disc strongly punctate; posterior margin slightly bisinuate, beveled. Scutellum small, setose. Elytra oval, very short and broad (LE/WE 1.25×; LE/LP 2.25×; WE/WP 1.40×); base slightly V-shaped, thickened; humeri absent; apical declivity abrupt; intervals flat; punctures of striae broad. Legs. Profemora slightly wider than metafemora (PF/MF 1.15×); protibiae mucronate, with line of 8-9 denticles on inner margin; meso and metatibiae lacking mucro and denticles; corbel of metatibiae moderately broad, covered with small scales; distal comb about as long as dorsal comb. Female terminalia. Sternite VIII and ovipositor as in figures 15–16. Spermatheca (Fig. 19) subcylindrical; collum truncate-conical, almost perpendicular to axis of spermathecal body, slightly shorter than in P. albosignatus; ramus indistinct; cornu shorter than spermathecal body, apex reaching level of gland entrance. Spermathecal gland ca. 2.2× as long as spermatheca; spermathecal duct ca. 5.7× as long as spermatheca. Allotype male (Fig. 6) 6 mm long. Pronotum slightly narrower and more elongate relative to elytra (WF/WR 1.50×, WP/LP 1.25×, LE/WE 1.30×, LE/LP 2.10×; WE/WP 1.30×). Profemora slightly wider than in females (ca. 1.18×); mesotibiae with small mucro. Male genitalia (Figs. 23, 25). Penis about as long as abdomen; penis body strongly curved, slightly shorter than its apodemes, more slender than in remaining members of the species group, with semicircular ostium; apex tapered. Endophallus lacking sclerites. Geographic distribution (Fig. 26). Mexico (Guerrero), between 500 and 1000 masl, in Acacia-cactus woodlands. Remarks. Most specimens of P. andersoni are slightly larger than those of P. albosignatus, and the background color of the vestiture is usually darker (dark-brown instead of grey), however, in one paratype from Xochipala the background is almost uniformly grey and the typical maculation of the species is almost absent. In the samples of P. andersoni the ratio females/males is about 1. Conversely, most populations of P. albosignatus occurring above 1,500 masl are composed only of females. Etymology. This new species is described after the outstanding weevil specialist and very good friend Robert Anderson, from the Canadian Museum of Nature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies→French-language works237,207→