MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6968763513 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5776764

Marenzelleria neglecta Sikorski & Bick 2004

2021· article· en· W6968763513 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCTDIdentical twinsComplication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Marenzelleria neglecta Sikorski & Bick, 2004 (Figs 1 & 2) Marenzelleria neglecta Sikorski & Bick, 2004: 264–268, figs 2B, 3C, 5A–I, 6. Syomin et al. 2017: 977−979, figs 2−5. Blank & Bastrop 2009: 316-318, fig. 1 (phylogeny). Marenzelleria viridis: Maciolek 1984 (Part.): 51–55, fig. 2. Bick & Burckhardt 1989: 239−241, fig. 1, pls VII−VIII. Bastrop et al. 1995: Baltic Sea population. Bochert & Bick 1995: 764−772, figs 2−12 (larval morphology). Bochert 1996a: 58−68, figs 1−31 (oogenesis); 1996b: 192−198, figs 1−27 (spermatogenesis). Röhner et al. 1996a: Baltic Sea population. Ysebaert et al. 1996: 178−179. Sikorski & Buzhinskaya 1998: 1118−1119, fig. 4. Fide Sikorski & Bick 2004 (Part.): 264. Not Verrill 1873. ? Marenzelleria viridis: Cohen & Carlton 1995: A4-1. Thompson et al. 2000: 15; 2013: 2290. Cohen et al. 2005: 11. Ranasinghe et al. 2012: 646. Marenzelleria cf. viridis: Bick & Zettler 1997: 141−142, figs 3, 4. Fide Sikorski & Bick 2004: 264. Marenzelleria type II: Röhner et al. 1996b: 281−283. Bastrop et al. 1997: 125−127; 1998: 98−102. Fide Sikorski & Bick 2004: 264. Remarks. Bastrop et al. ’s (1997, 1998) Marenzelleria Type II was found on the both sides of the North Atlantic and not formally named until Sikorski & Bick (2004) described it as a new species, M. neglecta. As noted above, Darss- Zingst-Boddenchain, Baltic Sea, Germany, was designated as the type locality of the species, although M. neglecta was recognized as alien in Europe, being introduced with ballast water from the Atlantic coast of USA (Bastrop et al. 1997, 1998). Based on genetic data (allozyme electrophoresis and/or 16S sequences), Bastrop et al. (1997, 1998) documented the presence of M. neglecta (as M. Type II) in the United States (Durham, New Hampshire; Chesapeake Bay, Maryland; Currituck Sound, North Carolina; Ogeechee River estuary, Georgia) and in Canada (Tuktoyaktuk Harbor, Northwest Territories) (Fig. 2). Notably, specimens of the only sample from New Hampshire (Durham, USNM 80485) were morphologically assigned to M. viridis by Maciolek (1984 *), Sikorski & Bick (2004), as well as one of us (VIR, May 2000). Bastrop et al. (1997: 128) sequenced the 16S mitochondrial fragments of three specimens from this sample and noticed that “Contradictions between the results of morphological and genetic species determination still exist … DNA sequence analysis has shown beyond doubt that these animals [USNM 80485] belong to Marenzelleria Type II [M. neglecta].” Based on the morphology, Sikorski & Bick (2004) identified M. neglecta from San Francisco Bay (California, USA). After the description of M. neglecta, Leslie H. Harris (in litt. 2 June, 5 July 2021) re-identified as M. neglecta specimens initially reported as M. viridis from California, USA (see below Remarks for M. viridis). Moreover, Leslie H. Harris (in litt. 5 July 2021) identified M. neglecta collected during the 2020 National Coastal Condition Assessment from Ilwaco marina, Columbia River mouth, Washington, USA (see VIR ID 24756 in Table S4). Following these identifications, reports of M. viridis from San Francisco Bay by Thompson et al. (2000, 2013) are also referred herein to M. neglecta. Complete information about records of M. neglecta from North America is given in Table S4. Distribution in North America. Atlantic coast: from New Hampshire south to Georgia, USA. Pacific coast: Washington and Northern California, USA. Arctic coast: Northwest Territories, Canada (Fig. 2). * Maciolek (1984: 52) mistakenly exchanged the catalogue numbers for two specimens collected by Jones, M. L. in Gloucester (Massachusetts) on 16 May 1959 (USNM 80483), and nine specimens collected by Long, C. D. at Fox Point (Durham, New Hampshire) on 24 Jul 1962 (USNM 80485).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicMarine and coastal ecosystems→French-language works237,207→