Rudolfina remiforma Paiero & Marshall 2020, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rudolfina remiforma sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 01D37BA9-BF63-4930-9EF1-E1BB6D87C73F Figs 19–20, 21C Etymology The species name is from the Latin for ‘oar-shaped’ and refers to the posterior lobe of the surstylus. Material examined Holotype MEXICO • ♂; Chiapas, 21 mi. N of Bochil; 5500 ft a.s.l.; 18–24 Aug. 1971; A. Newton leg.; pine, oak, Liquidambar, human dung; FMNH debu01086286. Paratypes MEXICO • 2 ♀♀; same collection data as for holotype; DEBU • 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; FMNH. Description BODY. Length: 1.4–1.8 mm. Eye height 2.0 × genal height. Head with 4 interfrontal setae and row of 7 small setulae along inner margin of orbital plate. Gena with 1 strong seta and 8 smaller setulae. Acrostichal setulae in 4–6 rows. Costagial seta extending to humeral break; second costal sector shorter than third (20:65); length of M 1 between crossveins dm-cu and r-m 1.4× dm-cu; CuA 1 stub vein ~2.5– 3.0× M 1 stub vein. Male mid femur with 6 weak setae in ventrobasal cluster. Male mid tibia with ventral comb of 4–5 robust setae on apical ⅓. MALE ABDOMEN (Fig. 19). Posterior margin of sternite 5 with small tooth on each side of medial emargination; emargination ~⅓ × width of sternite 5. Transverse part of sternite 6 weakly arcuate. Epandrium regular, not swollen, with pair of long setae ventrolaterally and another 2–3 smaller pairs dorsolateral to longer pair; subanal plate narrow, incomplete, with narrow medial space. Surstylus with small anterior lobe and elongate posterior lobe; anterior lobe with 4–5 elongate setae apically; posterior lobe paddle-like and drawn out into rounded tip, with posterior margin weakly expanded near mid-length, anterior margin greatly expanded just before midlength, and 1 large seta near base. Cercus small and conical, projecting posteriorly; apical seta present. Postgonite simple, apex narrowly rounded. Dorsal sclerite of distiphallus without distinct swellings and not extending distally beyond acrophallus (Fig. 19 D–F). FEMALE ABDOMEN (Fig. 20). Tergite 7 with posterior margin entire. Medial part of tergite 8 poorly sclerotized or fused with epiproct. Epiproct tulip-shaped, with length of anterior narrowed portion equal or subequal to that of posterior portion. Cercus small, as long as or only slightly longer than flattened apical seta; fused anterolaterally to epiproct. Sternite 7 with posterior margin broadly rounded. Spermathecae lenticular, inner surface with conical projection connecting with duct; paired spermathecae each with duct ~2.0 × length of spermatheca before common duct; single spermathecal duct similar in length. Remarks This species is closely related to R. exuberata sp. nov. and R. pauca sp. nov. and shares the modified epiproct found in those species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".