MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6968783834 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6154857

Cymadusa euclidius Hughes & Peart, 2013, sp. nov.

2013· article· en· W6968783834 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeBayPeduncle (anatomy)Coralline algaeMandible (arthropod mouthpart)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cymadusa euclidius sp. nov. (Figs. 18, 19) Type material. Holotype male, 17.0 mm, dissected, 4 slides, NMVJ64939, northeast end of Vancouver Peninsula, Western Australia (35°03’24”S 117°56’12”E), 6 m, 8 April 1984 (SWA 23). Additional material examined. Western Australia: Male, dissected, 4 slides, AM P.82616, 2 km southeast of South Point, Two Peoples Bay (34°58’S 118°12’E), 12 m, mixed coralline and green algae, seagrass, 16 December 1983, coll. R.T. Springthorpe (WA 183); female, dissected, 2 slides, AM P.82617, 2 km southeast of South Point, Two Peoples Bay (34°58’S 118°12’E), 12 m, mixed coralline and green algae, seagrass, 16 December 1983, coll. R.T. Springthorpe (WA 183); male, 16 mm, dissected, 3 slides, AM P.82616, 24 km north of Dongara (29°3’30”S 114°47’47”–42’12”E), 15 m, mixed coralline and green algae, sea grass, dredge, 16 December 1983, coll. R.T. Springthorpe (WA 183); female, dissected, 2 slides, AM P.82617, 24 km north of Dongara (29°3’30”S 114°47’47”–42’12”E), 15 m, mixed coralline and green algae, sea grass, dredge, 16 December 1983, coll. R.T. Springthorpe (WA 183). Type locality. Northeast end of Vancouver Peninsula, Western Australia (35°03’24”S 117°56’12”E). Etymology. Named in reference to Euclidean geometry, inspired by the clearly defined right angled corner of the male gnathopod 2 propodus palm. Diagnosis. Antenna 1 accessory flagellum 5-articulate. Antenna 2 peduncle article 4 subequal to article 5. Mandible accessory setal row with 9 robust setae. Maxilla 1 inner plate with 3 slender setae, outer plate palp slender, article 2 with 8 robust setae. Gnathopod 1 coxa distinctly larger than coxa 2, anterior margin convex, anteroventral corner produced, subacute; basis with single anterodistal lobe large, rounded; ischium anterior margin without lobes; propodus subrectangular, palm acute, convex, defined by 1 robust seta. Gnathopod 2 basis subequal in length to coxa, with single anterodistal lobe large, rounded, not reaching beyond ischium, without setae; ischium anterior margin without lobes; carpus subtriangular, 0.5 times propodus length, anterior margin with 4 robust setae; propodus subrectangular, palm nearly transverse, entire, with subquadrate distal tooth, palm corner subquadrate with 1 robust seta, palm length 0.3 times posterior margin; dactylus subequal in length to palm, apically acute, tapering evenly, inner margin crenate. Epimera 1–3 broadly rounded. Telson apically truncated, with 5 pairs of lateral setae and 4 pairs of apical setae. Description of holotype. Head. Antenna 1 similar to antenna 2; article 1 subequal to article 2 length; article 2 length 2.5 times article 3; primary flagellum incomplete, with more than 33 articles; accessory flagellum 5- articulate. Antenna 2 article 4 subequal to article 5; flagellum with 30 articles. Mandible accessory setal row with 9 robust setae; palp 3-articulate; article 2 with 4 slender setae; article 3 length twice width. Lower lip outer plates with slit; lateral lobes distinctly longer than medial lobes, with apical ducts; mandibular lobes with curved margins, subacute apically. Maxilla 1 inner plate with 3 slender setae; outer plate palp slender, article 2 with 8 robust setae. Pereon. Coxae 1–4 longer than broad. Gnathopod 1 coxa distinctly larger than coxa 2, as broad as deep, anterior margin convex, anteroventral corner produced, subacute; basis shorter than coxa, posterior margin with sparse slender setae, with single anterodistal lobe large, rounded with 2 slender setae; ischium anterior margin without lobes; merus anterodistal lobes subacute; carpus subrectangular, length 1.75 times width, 0.8 times propodus length, anterior margin with slender setae, posterior margin truncated; propodus subrectangular, length twice width, palm acute, convex, defined by 1 robust seta, palm length 0.5 times posterior margin; dactylus subequal in length to palm, apically acute, tapering evenly, inner margin crenate. Gnathopod 2 sexually dimorphic; basis subequal in length to coxa, with single anterodistal lobe large, rounded, not reaching beyond ischium, without setae; ischium anterior margin without lobes; merus margin anterodistal corner subacute; carpus subtriangular, length 1.1 times width, 0.5 times propodus length, anterior margin with 4 robust setae; propodus subrectangular, length 1.8 times width, palm nearly transverse, entire, with subquadrate distal tooth, palm corner subquadrate with 1 robust seta, palm length 0.3 times posterior margin; dactylus subequal in length to palm, apically acute, tapering evenly, inner margin crenate. Pleon. Epimera 1–3 broadly rounded. Uropod 1 long, reaching past uropod 2 rami; peduncle length 3 times width, with 9 robust setae, setal fringe 4/5 length of peduncle, with large, acute distoventral spine; inner ramus 0.9 times peduncle length, longer than outer ramus, with 6 marginal robust setae; outer ramus with 5 marginal robust setae. Uropod 2 peduncle with small subacute distoventral spine, with 4 robust setae; inner ramus with 3 marginal robust setae, subequal to outer ramus length; outer ramus with 3 marginal robust setae. Uropod 3 peduncle length 1.2 times width, with 7 distal peduncular robust seta and 4 distal slender setae; inner ramus 1.3 times width, subequal to outer ramus, with 8 distal robust seta and 7 distal slender setae; outer ramus with patch of small lateral denticles and 1 lateral robust seta, and 2 large recurved robust setae. Telson subtrapezoidal, apically truncated, with small apical cusps, 5 pairs of lateral setae, 2 pairs of lateral plumose setae and 4 pairs of apical setae. Remarks. Cymadusa euclidius sp. nov. aligns with C. brevidactyla, C. cavimana, C. hadros sp. nov., C. smilodonta and C. priscileo sp. nov., based on the short dactylus of gnathopod 2. In C. euclidius sp. nov. and C. hadros sp. nov. the gnathopod 2 propodus palm is transverse and the dactylus is subequal to the palm length, which separates these two speciesfrom C. brevidactyla, C. cavimana, C. smilodonta and C. priscileo sp. nov. It is possible that C. euclidius sp. nov., at 17 mm, represents a smaller male growth stage of C. hadros sp. nov., which reaches ~ 20 mm. However, article 2 of the maxilla 1 palp has eight robust setae, whereas C. Hadros sp. nov. has no robust setae. Uropod 2 of C. euclidius sp. nov. has a peduncle with a small distoventral spine and broader rami, which are shorter than the peduncle, whereas in C. hadros sp. nov., the peduncle is without a spine and the rami are more slender and subequal to the peduncle length. Distribution. Australia. Western Australia: Vancouver Peninsula, Two Peoples Bay, Dongara (current study).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicMarine Biology and Ecology Research→French-language works237,207→