MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6968790397 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3848337

Lesueurigobius stironensis Lin & Brzobohatý & Nolf & Girone 2017, sp. nov.

2017· article· en· W6968790397 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIchthyology and Marine Biology
Canadian institutionsBC Research (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeType localityParatypeDorsumSulcusKeelIsotopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lesueurigobius stironensis sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: CCEB6FA7-DA02-47B3-8A38-D7CA369E9E79 Fig. 11 F–I Diagnosis This species is characterised by high, pentagonal otoliths. The shape of the dorsal rim is very characteristic in bearing 4–6 large lobes, with the highest one located at the middle and lowering towards both ends. The other rims are nearly straight and perpendicular to each other. The sulcus is deep and ventrally directed at the anterior. Etymology The species is named after its type locality, the Torrente Stirone. Type material examined Holotype ITALY: a left otolith (IRSNB P 9689, Fig. 11F). Paratypes ITALY: 21 specimens of which 3 are figured (IRSNB P 9690– P 9692, Fig. 11 G–I). Type locality and horizon ITALY: Tortonian Clay exposed in the Torrente Stirone. Dimensions of the holotype Length = 1.75 mm, height = 1.80 mm, thickness = 0.55 mm. Description The otoliths are tall and pentagonal. The dorsal rim bears 4–6 large lobes; the largest and highest lobe and highest lobe is located in the middle and marks the highest point of the otolith. The anterior and posterior rims are almost straight, and the ventral rim is straight in the holotype but very slightly curved in some of the paratypes (e.g., Fig. 11I). In some specimens, however, the anterior rim is crenulated at the lower part and a small concavity is observed in the middle part of the posterior rim (e.g., Fig. 11G). The inner face is more or less flat; the outer face is convex. The sulcus is deep, clearly delimited, and well-divided into ostium and cauda; the anterior part of the ostium is directed ventrally. The cristae are well-developed. The ostium is large and expanded ventrally, with a concavity at the antero-dorsal margin. The cauda is rod-like and rounded at the posterior end. There is a marked swollen collicular crest just below the cauda. Remarks The otoliths of this new species are easily recognised and the shape of the dorsal rim is consistent regardless of size among the available material. The sulcus shape and a slightly asymmetric dorsal rim of the otoliths are the main reasons for attributing this new species to the genus Lesueurigobius. Several Lesueurigobius otoliths have been reported from the Miocene of the Mediterranean (e.g., Reichenbacher & Cappetta 1999: pl. 3, figs 1–5, L. vicinalis (Koken, 1891); Hoedemakers & Batllori 2005: pl. 11, figs 9–13, Lesueurigobius sp.), but none of them present the characteristic morphology of the dorsal rim as our new species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicIchthyology and Marine Biology→French-language works237,207→