MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6968802381 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5626942

Raphidascaris Railliet & Henry 1915

2016· article· en· W6968802381 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcretory systemGenusParatenicSponge spiculeLarva

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Raphidascaris Railliet & Henry, 1915 Synonyms: Hysterothylacium Ward & Magath, 1917; Ichthyascaris Wu, 1949;? Neogoezia Kreis, 1937 Preamble: Raphidascaris acus is the only species of the genus known from Canadian fishes. The life cycle of R. acus was discussed by J. D. Smith (1984b) and Moravec (2013) and involves predatory fishes as final hosts, and various invertebrates and fishes as paratenic or intermediate hosts. Adult and larval stages of R. acus are described below. Generic diagnosis (after Moravec 2013). Raphidascaridinae. Large nematodes, widest in midbody. Cuticle with distinct striations. Lips well developed, of complex structure. Interlabia rudimentary or absent. Excretory pore slightly behind nerve ring level. Narrow lateral alae may be present. Preventriculus muscular; ventriculus almost spherical; posteriorly directed ventricular appendix present. Intestinal caecum absent. Spicules subequal, arcuate, alate. Caudal papillae numerous. Vulva anterior to mid-length of body. Oviparous. Parasites of marine and freshwater fishes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicParasite Biology and Host Interactions→French-language works237,207→