Rheotanytarsus muscicola Thienemann
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rheotanytarsus muscicola Thienemann Rheotanytarsus muscicola Thienemann 1929: 114, Lehman 1970: 362 (Figs. 11–13), Reiss 1971: 208, Cranston 1974: 94, Albu 1980: 284 (Fig. 191), Wang and Zheng 1993: 90 (Fig. 3). Material examined. 1 male (BDN No. 08295), China, Shanxi Province, Feng Country, Qin Mountain, 1300m. 27. VII. 1994, Leg. W Bu. 1 male (BDN No. 03664), Fujian Province, Shanghang Country, Buyun Mountain. 6. V. 1993, Leg X Wang. 1 male (BDN No. 10784), Yunnan Province, Hutiaoxia. 26. V. 1996, Leg. Du. 1 male (BDN No. 01081), Shandong Province, Mouping Country, Nan Village. 28. VIII. 1988. Leg. X Wang. 1 male (BDN No. 09338), Yunnan Province, Huaze Country, Xin Village, Chahe. V. 30. 1996. 1 male (BDN No. 20229): M: China, Guangdong Province, Fengkai Country, Heishiding natural reservation. IV. 20. 1988. Distribution. The species has a wide distribution in Europe, North Africa, and Canada (Holarctic Region). In China, it is distributed in Shandong, Shanxi (Palaearctic Region) and Fujian, Sichuan, Yunnan, Guangdong Provinces (Oriental Region). Our records are the first for the Oriental Region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".