MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968845320 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5997908

Phytomyza loewii Hendel

2018· article· en· W6968845320 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCurcumin's Biomedical Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClematisFrassLarvaTaxonomy (biology)Inflorescence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phytomyza loewii Hendel (Figs. 48, 193) Material examined. MASSACHUSETTS: Franklin Co., Northfield, 276 Old Wendell Rd., 29.vi–2.vii.2016, em. 18.vii–2.viii.2016, C.S. Eiseman, ex Clematis virginiana, #CSE2778, CNC654120–654168 (23♂ 26♀); Northfield, 42.645962, -72.427679, 29.vi.2016, C.S. Eiseman, on Clematis virginiana, #CSE2646, CNC654108 (1♂). Hosts. Ranunculaceae: Clematis ligusticifolia Nutt. (Frick 1959), C. * virginiana L.; adults caught on C. occidentalis (Hornem.) DC. (Spencer 1969). Leaf mine. (Fig. 193) According to Spencer (1981), an “upper surface linear mine which gradually widens... and can appear as a blotch in small leaves”. The mines on Clematis virginiana begin with a small contorted portion that is initially on the lower leaf surface. They are whitish with frass in fine, closely spaced, black grains, sometimes forming beaded strips along the sides and sometimes more scattered. The larva exits through a slit on the lower leaf surface. Puparium. (Fig. 48) Brownish, deeply segmented; formed outside the mine (Spencer 1981). In the field, the puparium was often found loosely attached to the lower leaf surface near the exit slit. Distribution. USA: CA, DC, GA, ID, IN, LA, *MA, WA; Canada: QC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicCurcumin's Biomedical ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207