MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mapped winter road connections to remote First Nations communities in Canada 2022-2023, using open data sources and satellite imagery

2024· dataset· en· W6968856420 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNERC Environmental Data Service · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Environment Research Council
KeywordsOpen waterSatellite imageryQuadratShapefileClimate changeGeographic coordinate systemGlobal Positioning SystemData archive

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset consists of shapefile outlines of winter roads and ice roads in Canada, verified for the 2022-2023 winter road season. It focuses on the public winter roads leading to remote First Nations communities which have no permanent land access. The line data also includes private winter roads, community-built winter roads where information is available, and feeder roads connecting to the permanent road network. First Nations communities connected solely by winter roads are included as point locations. Their local roads were likewise verified, updated, or newly digitised if not included in Canada's National Road Network (NRN) data. Features were traced by hand and information was extracted from Canada's NRN open datasets and then modified using Esri Imagery Basemap, Planet Labs and provincial, municipal and federal information. This dataset aims to provide a temporally and spatially consistent record of varying provincial datasets to support respective infrastructure departments and environmental research of surface and climatic conditions surrounding winter roads. The dataset was produced and funded through a NERC QUADRAT DTP studentship (NE/S007377/1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.152

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.015
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNERC Environmental Data ServiceFrench-language works237,207