MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968874110 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5996961

Haplodrassus signifer C.L. Koch 1839

2018· article· en· W6968874110 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarapaceHolotypeCrestChelaAbdomenTrunk

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Haplodrassus signifer (C.L. Koch, 1839) Figs 154‒161, 167‒171 Drassus signifer C. L. Koch, 1839: 31, fig. 452 (♀). Drassodes troglodytes: Simon 1914: 122, 140, 209, Figs 249‒250. Haplodrassus signifer: Grimm 1985: 147, figs 146‒148, 170‒171; Levy 2004: 19, figs 46‒52. Types. Holotype female of Drassus signifer from Bohemia; not examined. Diagnosis. Males of this species are easily recognized by the presence of a distinct crest on the sigmoid embolic apophysis of the palp (Figs 158, 164) and the rounded dilatation of the tibial apophysis (Figs 159, 168). Females resemble H. securifer sp. n. but can be distinguished by the straight anterior margin of the pro-fovea (Figs 151, 165), curved in H. signifer (Figs 160, 170) and the more rounded lateral pockets (Figs 166 versus 171). Description. Measurements: Male (n=20): Total length 4.7‒7.4; carapace 2.1‒3.4 long, 1.7‒2.7 wide. Female (n=20): Total length 5.1‒11.8; carapace 2.1‒5.5 long, 2.1‒5.5 wide. Colour: Carapace reddish brown with darker cephalic part and radiating striae; legs yellowish brown; abdomen dark grey to black, often with obscure paler chevrons. Spinulation: General pattern, but ventral spines on Mt I often absent. Male palp (Figs 156‒159, 167‒169): Tibial apophysis distinctly constricted distally, then widening into a rounded knob (Figs 159, 168); embolic apophysis S-shaped, distal part with a distinct crest (Figs 158, 164). Epigyne (Figs 160‒161, 170‒171): As long as wide; hood strongly recurved laterally; pro-fovea short by the prolonged anterior margin of the areola, half the length of the fovea (Figs 160, 170); fovea often with median groove; lateral pockets reniform (Figs 161, 171). Citations in the Maghreb. TUNISIA, Tunis, La Mohammedia (Pavesi 1880), Tunis (Pavesi 1884), Kairouan, Kairouan (Pavesi 1880). Further material examined. AFRICA, ALGERIA, Tébessa, Tébessa, 1300m, forêt de Bekkaria (N35°21'20” E8°14'40”), 2♂, pitfalls in Pinus halepensis forest, 1.V.1989 (CRB). MOROCCO, Béni Mellal-Khénifra, Aguelmane Azigza, 1♂ 1♀, 6.IV.1950, Ch. Alluaud leg. (ISRM); Rabat-Salé-Kénitra, Oulmès S., ravin de l’Oued Assellalou (N33°25’25” W 6°00’ 10), 1♀, 11.III.1955, J. B. Panouse leg. (ISRM). EUROPE, SPAIN, Alava, Salvatierra (N42°51'5” W2°23'28”), 1♂ 2♀, stones in low maquis, 6.IV.1992 (CRB), Avila, Puerto del Pico (N40°19'16” W5°0'46”), 1300m, 1♀, 15.V.1992, P. Poot leg. (CRB), Puerto de Menga (N40°28'36” W5°0' 42""), 1570m, 1♀, stones in grassland, 1.IV.1997 (CRB), Burgos, Puerto de la Brugula (N42°25'49” W3°30'11”), 990m, 2♀, stones in Pinus forest, 31.III.1997 (CRB), Cantabria, Puerto de San Glorio (N43°4'1” W4°45'51”), 1500m, 1♂ 2♀, pitfalls in wasteland, 17.VII.1985 (CRB), Ciudad Real, Pozuelo de Calatrava (N38°53’6” W3°50’53”), 2♀, J. M. de la Fuente leg, Coll. Simon 24235 (MNHN AR15705), Gerona, Collada de Toses (N42°19'50” E2°2'10”), 1800m, 3♂, pitfalls in dry Pinus forest, 10.VII.1991 (CRB), Málaga, Casares (N36°26'48” W5°17'8”), 2♀, V.1986, J. De Beir leg. (CRB), Palencia, Fuentes de Nava, Laguna de la Nava (N39°2’58” W3°41’47”), 1♂ 1♀, IV.‒XI.1996, U. Stengele leg. (CRB), Rioja, Navarrete (N42°25'41” W2°33'49”), 420m, 1♂ 1♀, stones in grassland, 7.IV.1992 (CRB), Segovia, 10 km E. Casla (N41°7'20” W3°41'52”), 1100m, 1♀, stones in grassland, 31.III.1997 (CRB), Toledo, Talavera la Nueva (N39°55'11” W4°52'22”), 370m, 1♂, litter in forest along Rio Tajo, 1.IV.1997 (CRB). FRANCE, mixed unknown localities (‘ Gallia Meridionalis’), one of them Alpes-Maritimes, Menton, 2♂ 1♀, as Drassodes macellinus hebes, Coll. Simon 2083 (MNHN AR15708), Haute-Corse, Calacuccia, Lozzi, road to Monte Cinto (N42°20'46” E9°0'25”), 1200m, 2♀, stones in maquis, 25.V.1995 (CRB), 10 km from Calvi (N42°33’57” E8°45’25”), 1♂ 2♀, pitfalls in maquis, 15. V.1982 (CRB), Col de Vergio (N42°17'24” E8°52'39”), 1460m, 3♂ 1♀, stones in Juniperus forest, 24.V.1995 (CRB), Gorges de Restonica (N42°14'28” E9°10'52”), 1300m, 1♂, stones in Pinus laricio forest, 26.V.1995 (CRB), E. Urtaca (N42°35'40” E9°9' 57'), 1♂, stones in garrigue, 23.V.1995 (CRB), Haute -Savoie, Saint Julien-Mont-Denis (N45°14'48” E6°25'30”), 750m, 1♀, pitfalls in grassland, 6.VI.1986 (CRB), Pyrénées-Orientales, Mont Canigou, Escala de l’Ours (N42°32'58” E2°29'40”), 1400m, 1♂, 5.VII.1991 (CRB), Col de Puymorens, 1850m, 2♂ 1♀, pitfalls in dry grassland, 11. VI.1991 (CRB). ITALY, Sardinia, Carbonia-Iglesias, Fluminimaggiore S. (N39°24'38” E8°29'26”), at entrance of Grotta su Manua, 200m, 1♂, seeving Quercus litter, 15.IV.2014 (CRB), Nuoro, Orgosolo N. (N40°13'6” E9°22'47”), 610m, 1♀, seeving Quercus litter, 18.IV.2014 (CRB), Sassari, Alghero W., Parco di Porto (N40°36'59” E8°9'51”), 1♂ 1♀, 10.IV.2014 (CRB). GREECE, Attiki-Saronic Islands, Attiki, Marathon, Enoee ruins (N38°9'28” E23°56'1”), 80m, 1♂ 1♀, stones in phrygana, 19.IV.2000 (CRB), Oros Imittos, W. Peania (N37°56'47” E23°50'0”), 450m, 1♀, 20.IV.2000 (CRB), Crete, Sitia, 2♀, as H. severus, Grimm det. (MCSNB), Ipeiros, Ioannina, Vikos-Aoos national park, Astraka (N39°57'54” E20°47'31”), 1910m, 2♀, pitfalls in grassland, 12.VII.2007, B. Vandenberghe leg. (CRB), Evvoia- Voroies Sporades, Evvoia, Papades, Aghia Anna (N38°55'44” E23°21'51”), 550m, 1♀, stones in grassland, 12.V.2001 (CRB), Evvoia, Prokopi-Nea Pagontas road (N38°42'38” E23°30'57”), 700m, 1♂, stones in grassland, 10.V.2001 (CRB), Kyklades: Iraklia (N36°50’15” E25°27’21”), 50m, 1♀, on walls of house, 6.III.2016, 1♀, 9.IV.2017, 1♂, in pitfals in phrygana, 20.IV.2017, Y. Gavalas leg. (CYG); Makedonia, Halkidiki, Monopigado (N40°26'4” E23°8'5”), 400m, 1♂, pitfalls in Quercus forest, 22.III‒12.VI.2004, L. Provoost leg. (CRB), Thessaloniki, NE. Thessaloniki (N40°42'20” E22°58'58”), 200m, 1♂, pitfalls in dry Pinus forest, 7.II‒6.VI.2004, L. Provoost leg. (CRB), Peloponnisos, Argolis, Achladokambos (N37°32'44” E22°31'10”) 1000m, 2♀, under stones, 26.IV.2016 (CRB), Korinthia, Lake Stymphalia, (N37°50'39” E22°27'15”), 615m, 1♂, pitfalls under Quercus bushes on slope to lake, 20.IV‒27.IV.2016 (CRB), Sterea Elada, Etolio-Akarnania, Paleros S., Agios Dimitriou (N38°46'6” E20°53'6”), 50m, 2♀, stones in quarry, 17.IV.2000 (CRB), Stanos S., lake Amvrakia (N38°46'51” E21°11'17”), 20m, 1♂, stones in olive groove, 15.IV.2000 (CRB), Fokida, Lake Mornou (N38°31'06” E22°09'06”), 440m, 1♀, 25.IV.2015, P. Ponel leg. (CPP), Voiotia, Oros Parnassos, Kalivia Arachovas (N38°31'24” E22°32'49”), 900m, 1♀, pitfalls in grassland, 18.IV.2000 (CRB), Thiva (N38°19’30” E23°19’08”), 200m, 1♀, 1998, L. Picard leg. (CRB). CYPRUS, Famagusta, Büyükkonuk (Konik) (N35°24'32” E33°59'28”), 150m, 1♂, pitfalls in Pinus forest, III‒V.2011 (CRB), Yenibogaziçi (Agios Sergios) (N35°12'3” E35°53'43”), 30m, 1♂, stones in phrygiana, 17.III.2011, 1♂, in pitfalls at same site, 15‒ 27.V.2011 (CRB), Kyrenia, Kalkani (Kalo Chorio) (N35°15'27” E33°2'22”), 100m, 1♀, stones in grassland, 20.III.2011 (CRB), Vouni ruins (N35°10'11” E32°46'24”), 250m, 1♀, under stones, 20.IIII.2011 (CRB), Pafos, Kouklia-Pissoura road (34°40'27” E32°37'06”), 150m, 1♀, stony slope to the sea, 22.III.2011 (CRB), Nicosia, Prodromos E., near Prodromos dam (N34°56'58” E32°50'39”), 1550m, 1♀, stones in Pinus forest, 23.V.2001 (CRB). Distribution. Holarctic. In the Nearctic it is known from southern Canada, to central-S Mexico, in the Palaearctic up to 70°. In the Maghreb, the species appears to be rare. It is known from the NE of Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia and Libya.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomyFrench-language works237,207