Terre, Terroir et Territoire : Débat public sur l'agriculture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chôros a été mandaté pour assurer un apport scientifique de soutien à la CNDP dans son travail de préparation et d’analyse du Débat National sur la nouvelle Politique Agricole Commune. Son travail a porté sur l’identification des enjeux contemporains du rapport entre agriculture et société afin de composer un regard englobant, placé dans une temporalité longue, capable d’unifier ces enjeux dans une problématique commune. Chôros compte une équipe permanente de cinq chercheurs avec les apports ponctuels de quatre autres collaborateurs. L’approche proposée par Chôros s’appuie sur les compétences théoriques et empiriques des membres de l’équipe, notamment en géographie contemporaine de la France et de l’Europe, en politiques européennes, en démocratie participative et interactive et en analyse du discours.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.019 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".