Bibliographic record
Abstract
COPRINI COPRIS Geoffroy, 1762. Histoire Abrégée des Insectes..., p. 87. Litocopris Waterhouse 1891. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (ser. 6) 8: 53. costaricensis Gahan 1894. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (ser. 6) 14: 116. Chiriqui. furcillatus Felsche 1910. Deutsche Ent. Zeit. 1910: 345. incertus Say 1835. Boston J. Nat. Hist. 1: 175. Bocas del Toro, Canal Zone, Chiriqui, Coclé, Colón, Panama. procidua Say 1835. Boston J. Nat. Hist. 1: 176. lugubris Boheman 1858. Coleoptera. In Kongliga Svenska Freg. Eugen. Jorden ... Zool., 1: 42. Canal Zone, Chiriqui, Panama. subpunctatus Gillet 1910. Notes Leiden Mus. 32: 3. Chiriqui. DICHOTOMIUS Hope 1838. Ent. Mag. 5: 321. Homocopris Burmeister 1846. Gen. Quaed. Insect. 1 (10): 27. Selenocopris Burmeister 1846. Gen. Quaed. Insect. 1 (10): 27. Pinotus Erichson 1847. Arch. Natur. 13: 108. Brachycopris Haldeman 1848. J. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phil. 1: 125. agenor (Harold 1869). Abeille 6: 141. Canal Zone, Coclé, Panama. amicitiae Kohlmann and Solís 1997. G. Ital. Ent. 8: 346. Canal Zone, Chiriqui, Coclé, Los Satos, Panama. annae Kohlmann and Solís 1997. G. Ital. Ent. 8: 350. Chiriqui. costaricensis (Luederwaldt 1935). Rev. Ent. 5: 335. Panama. femoratus Howden and Young 1981. Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst. 18: 128. Canal Zone, Panama. gamboaensis Howden and Young 1981. Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst. 18: 129. Canal Zone. inachus (Erichson 1847). Arch. Natur. 13: 108. Coclé. satanus (Harold 1867). Col. Hefte 2: 98. Bocas del Toro, Canal Zone, Chiriqui, Darien, Colón, Panama. ONTHERUS Erichson 1847. Arch. Natur. 13: 107. azteca Harold 1869. Ann. Soc. Ent. France (ser. 4) 9: 503. Canal Zone. villosus Luederwaldt 1930. Arch. Inst. Biol. 3: 107. strius Howden and Young 1981. Contr. Amer. Ent. Inst. 18: 122. brevipennis Harold 1867. Col. Hefte 2: 97. Chiriqui, Colón. pseudodidymus Génier 1996. Mem. Ent. Soc. Canada No. 170: 63. Chiriqui, Coclé, Darien.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.154 | 0.119 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".