MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968884541 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5062761

Neolimnophila placida

2019· article· en· W6968884541 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicStudy of Mite Species
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCzechContext (archaeology)Class (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neolimnophila placida (Meigen, 1830) (Figs 4–6, 11) Limnobia placida Meigen, 1830: 275 (description). Limnobia hyalipennis Zetterstedt, 1851: 3842 (description). Limnophila ultima Osten Sacken, 1860: 238 (description), Fig. 26 (male terminalia) – syn. nov. Neolimnophila placida: EDWARDS (1938): 99 (diagnosis), Text-Fig. 18b (male terminalia); SAVCHENKO (1982): 19 (redescription), Fig. 8 /2 (male terminalia); PODENAS et al. (2006): 112, Fig. 29.5 (male terminalia) [copied from SAVCHENKO 1982] Neolimnophila ultima: ALEXANDER (1966): 430 (diagnosis), Fig. 47B (wing). Material examined (7 ♁♁ 17 ♀♀). U.S.A.: INDIANA: Jefferson Co., 15.ix.1934, 2 ♁♁ (J. S. Rogers leg.) (JSOC). CZECH REPUBLIC: MORAVIA: Moravskoslezské Beskydy Mts [= Beskydy Mts], Prostřední Bečva (600 m), 7.vi.1994, 1 ♁; Lazníky nr. Přerov, 30.v.1991, 1 ♀, 8.vi.1991, 3 ♁♁ 1 ♀, 9.vi.1991, 1 ♁ (all J. Starý leg.); Lešná nr. Zlín [= nr. Gottwaldov], 19.vii.1977, 3 ♀♀ (J. Starý leg., at light), 17.v.1979, 1 ♀ (V. Elsner leg., light trap), 6.vi.1980, 1 ♀ (J. Starý leg., at light) [listed by STARÝ (1986)], 4.ix.1985, 1 ♀ (V. Elsner, at light), 20.v.1987, 1 ♀ (V. Elsner leg., at light); Hrobice nr. Zlín, 19.viii.1980, 1♀ (V. Elsner leg., at light), 24.viii.1981, 1 ♀ (J. Starý leg.), 14.vii.1982, 1 ♀ (J. Starý leg., at light) [listed by STARÝ (1986)]; Bílé Karpaty Mts, Javorník, “Machová”, 29.ix.1998, 1♀ (J. Starý leg., at light) (all JSOC). POLAND: Tuszyn nr. Lódż, 4.–6.vii.1980, 1 ♀, 7.vii.1980, 1 ♀, 3.viii.1980, 1 ♀ (B. Soszyński leg.) (JSOC). SLOVAKIA: Poľana Mts, Čierny Potok (700 m), 8.vi.1999, 1 ♀ (J. Starý leg., at light) [listed by STARÝ (2009)] (JSOC). Material not examined by the author (3 ♁♁). Based on my drawings and diagnoses, D. I. Gavryushin (ZMUM) kindly identified some specimens, previously labelled mostly as N. placida. Those belonging to N. placida in the present concept are listed below, others, as N. alaskana, are listed under the latter species. – RUSSIA: NORTH EUROPEAN RUSSIA: Arkhangelsk env.(35 m), 64.525117°N, 40.719567°E, 5.viii.2011, 1♁ (D. I. Gavryushin leg.) (ZMUM); Leningrad Region [= oblast], Vsevolozhskiy District, Jukki village, 13.vii.1933, 1 ♁ (A. A. Stackelberg leg.) (ZISP). NORTHWEST EUROPEAN RUSSIA: Pskov Region, Plyusskiy District, Kharlamova Gora village, 9.viii.1891, 1 ♁ (F. D. Pleske leg.) (ZISP). Diagnosis. Antenna rather short, with verticils short, longest ones shorter than their respective segments. Dorsum of thorax heavily suffused with bluish dark grey pruinosity, prescutum with four brown stripes. Wing comparatively narrow, width-length ratio about 1: 3.8. Male terminalia with two spines at base of gonocoxite, ventral spine about one third length of dorsal one, outer gonostylus comparatively stout and short, and with paramere narrow, its distal outer extension conspicuous. Wing length 5.8–8.6 mm. Redescription. Male. Head dark brown, suffused with bluish dark grey pruinosity on frons and vertex. Palpus and rostrum dark brown. Antenna dark brown throughout, comparatively short, shorter than that of N. carteri and N. alaskana, not reaching to base of wing, with scape greyish pruinose. Flagellum consisting of basal fusion element and subsequent 10 long-ovoid flagellomeres, with verticils sparse and short, longest ones shorter than their respective segments. Thorax generally dark brown, heavily suffused with bluish dark grey pruinosity, especially on dorsum, sometimes indistinctly paler on anterior paratergite and posterolaterally on scutal lobes. Prescutum with four brown stripes. Wing comparatively narrow, width-length ratio about 1: 3.8, sometimes with faintly indicated stigma. Venation usual for Neolimnophila. Sc 1 ending opposite or slightly before fork of Rs. R 2 (cross-vein r) at or at most its own length before or slightly beyond fork of R 3+4. R 3 from shorter to subequal in length to R 3+4. Latter vein slightly arched. Cross-vein m-cu at from one fourth to one third length of discal cell (Fig. 11). Halter pale on stem, weakly infuscated on knob. Legs brown, with setae on femora comparatively short, decumbent, less than diameter of femur. Abdomen dark brown. Male terminalia (Figs 4–6). Tergite 9 interrupted medially. Gonocoxite with two spines at base: longer, positioned dorsally, subequal in length to corresponding spine in N. carteri and N. alaskana, about one third length of gonocoxite; shorter about one third length of dorsal spine, positioned more ventrally and medially. Both spines with delicate membranous scales distally. Outer gonostylus shorter than that in N. alaskana and stouter than in N. carteri and N. alaskana, from base evenly slightly narrowed distally for about two thirds its length, slightly concave before apical hook, hook microscopically serrate at outer margin. Paramere not as broad as in N. carteri and N. alaskana, truncate at apex, conspicuously extended disto-laterally into spinous point. Female resembling male in general appearance, including length and structure of antenna and outline of wing. Female terminalia not essentially different externally from those of other species. Distribution. Canada, U.S.A. (as far south as Mississippi and Georgia); Europe, including European Russia; West and East Siberia, Far East of Russia; Kazakhstan; Mongolia; Japan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicStudy of Mite SpeciesFrench-language works237,207