MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968890563 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6625442

Lepus peguensis Blyth 1856

2016· article· en· W6968890563 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPrimate Behavior and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubspeciesSubgenusTaxonomy (biology)BurmeseDorsumKey (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

34. Burmese Hare Lepus peguensis French: Liévre du Pégou / German: Burmesischer-Hase / Spanish: Liebre de Birmania Other common names: Siamese Hare Taxonomy. Lepus peguensis Blyth, 1856, “Pegu,” Upper Pegu, Burma (= Myanmar). It was placed as in the genus Caprolagus and subgenus Indolagus. Formerly, L. peguensis included L. hainanus, which received species status. Lepus peguensis needs taxonomic clarification. A third subspecies (siamensis) is under discussion to be a valid species. It has been suggested that L. peguensis is conspecific with L. nigricollis because of its close resemblance to L. n. ruficaudatus. Nevertheless, L. n. ruficaudatus appears to live allopatrically with L. peguensis from eastern India to western Myanmar. A study of dental characteristics concluded that separate species status of L. peguensis was equivocal. As taxonomists are still trying to clarify the species differentiation in Lepus, the subspecific taxonomy is not elaborated yet. The original descriptions of the subspecies are often not very helpful as they are mostly based on few exterior characteristics and small numbers of individuals. It has been shown that the variability is clinal in more careful investigations. Hence, the distinction in subspecies might be arbitrary and unreasonable. Two subspecies recognized. Subspecies and Distribution. L. p. peguensisBlyth, 1855 — C & SMyanmarfromtheChindwinRivervalleyStoNMalayPeninsula. L. p. vassali Thomas, 1906 — Laos, Thailand, Cambodia, and S Vietnam. Descriptive notes. Head—body 400-590 mm, tail 55-84 mm, ear 80-90 mm, hindfoot 96-110 mm; weight 2.2-5 kg. The Burmese Hare is medium-sized and closely resembles the Indian Hare (L. nigricollis). Dorsal pelage is reddish gray, mixed with black and grayer on rump. Ventral pelage is white. Ears are rather large with distinct black tips. Tail is black above and white below. Feet vary, being white in Burmese specimens and fulvous in Thailand specimens. Habitat. Lowlands, land cleared for crops, and dry wasteland. The Burmese Hare occurs in sandy regions along the coast in Malaya and southern Vietnam, butit lives in forest clearings in lalang grass (Imperata cylindrical, Poaceae) or around hill tribe villages in Thailand. Numbers of Burmese Hares are especially high in grass and shrub vegetation of seasonally exposed large river channels. In Thailand, they live in rain/ flood-fed low-intensity rice fields but avoid irrigated multi-croprice fields. A collection expedition in Thailand in 1940 recorded the Burmese Hare at an elevation of 1300 m on Mount Inthanon. Nevertheless, numerous field surveys have not recorded it above 700 m, so an upperlimit of 1300 m is questionable. Burmese Hares spend the day in forms located under bushes orin tall grass. Food and Feeding. Diet of the Burmese Hare includes grass, bark, and twigs. Breeding. The Burmese Hare might have several litters per year. Litter sizes are 1-7 young (typically 2-4 young). Gestation lasts 35-40 days. Young are born in open grassy areas and are fully furred with eyes open. Activity patterns. The Burmese Hare is crepuscular and nocturnal. Movements, Home range and Social organization. The Burmese Hare usually lives alone and is territorial. Individuals become very aggressive during the breeding season, and they fight with forefeet or kick with hindfeet. Status and Conservation. Classified as Least Concern on The IUCN Red List. The Burmese Hare is widespread and common, with an overall stable population. Its distribution probably includes northern and central regions of Laos, because signs ofits presence in the wild and fresh kills in markets have been noted (but only to the genus level). Its distribution in Myanmaris largely speculative, and it might be more restricted there. Habitat of the Burmese Hare is probably expanding due to forest clearing, but it occurs in populationsisolated by forest cover. It is heavily hunted, but this does not seem to be a major threat. Extension of irrigated rice fields destroys habitat in some areas. Habitats in Laos and Vietnam are regularly burned during the dry season (February—May), which might pose a threat to young unable to avoid fire. Recommendations are to clarify taxonomy, distribution, and behavior of the Burmese Hare. Bibliography. Allen & Coolidge (1940), Angermann (2016), Duckworth (1996), Duckworth, Steinmetz & Pattanavibool (2008), Duckworth, Timmins et al. (1994), Ellerman & Morrison-Scott (1955), Evans et al. (2000), Flux & Angermann (1990), Gyldenstolpe (1917), Hoffmann & Smith (2005), Kloss (1919), Lekagul & McNeely (1977), Lissovsky (2016), Petter (1961), Pfeffer (1969), Suchentrunk (2004), Van Peenen (1969). Wroughton (1915).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPrimate Behavior and EcologyFrench-language works237,207