Bibliographic record
Abstract
Planocera pellucida (Mertens, 1833) Figs 1B, 7J Planaria pellucida Mertens, 1833: 8–13, pl. 1 Stylochus pellucidus – Ehrenberg 1836: 67. — Diesing 1850: 216. — Claparède 1861: 143. — Moseley 1877: 23. Planocera pellucida – Örsted 1844: 48. Gnesioceros pellucidus – Diesing 1862: 571. Material examined MADEIRA • 1 spec.; 32°41′18.52″ N, 16°58′57.36″ W (Fig. 1B); 2000; Leopoldo Moro leg.; RCCN. Distribution Atlantic Ocean, between Newfoundland and Ireland (type locality) (Mertens 1833); Pacific Ocean (Graff 1892; Woodworth 1894; Plehn 1896); Canary Islands (De Vera et al. 2009; Cuadrado et al. 2017); Vietnam (Dawydoff 1952); the North Sea (Prudhoe 1982); Japan (Kato 1938); the Mediterranean Sea (Lang 1879, 1884; Riedl 1959; Marquina et al. 2014); pelagic fauna of the Atlantic Ocean (Graff 1892; Plehn 1896); Cape Verde and Ascension islands (Plehn 1896; Laidlaw 1903); New record Madeira. Remarks Planocera pellucida, together with Pseudoceros wirtzi, Pseudoceros cf. maximus and Prostheceraeus giesbrechtii are the three polyclad species currently recorded for Madeira. As can be seen in Fig. 7J. The specimens of Planocera pellucida from Madeira do not differ molecularly from those captured in the Canary Islands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.060 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".