MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968921402 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8036254

Microphorella Becker

2023· article· en· W6968921402 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFiscal Policies and Political Economy
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaApex (geometry)Arthropod mouthpartsScutellumThorax (insect anatomy)Lamella (surface anatomy)WingDome (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microphorella Becker Microphorella Becker, 1909: 28. Type species: Microphorus praecox Loew, 1864, by original designation. Diagnosis. Southern Hemisphere Microphorella can be distinguished from other parathalassiines by the following suite of characters (similar to the diagnosis of Australasian Microphorella given in Brooks & Cumming 2022): head with face broad, subequal to wider than combined width of antennal bases, or strongly narrowed ventrally (e.g., males of M. amorimi sp. nov.), gena weakly developed to moderately broad, antenna with arista-like stylus not lengthened (about 3X length of postpedicel or shorter) (Figs 6, 15), mouthparts directed ventrally, palpus narrowly ovate (Fig. 6), subtriangular, or broadly clavate and flattened (Fig. 26); thorax with prosternum fused to proepisternum and forming precoxal bridge, scutellum with 1 pair of strong setae near apex; wing with vein M 2 and cell dm present (Figs 8, 17), vein R 1 reaching costa beyond or (rarely) just before base of M 2, cell cua convex apically, vein CuA + CuP short to absent, anal lobe barely developed; male terminalia with right epandrial lamella lacking ventral process, cerci including hypoproct nearly symmetrical and pointed to highly asymmetrical (Fig. 21); female abdomen with apical segments retractable into segment 5 or 6, syntergite 9+10 divided and bearing acanthophorous setae (Fig. 22) or acanthophorous spines (Fig. 13), cercus relatively broad, with apex pointed or broadly rounded, with or without long apical seta(e). Remarks. Cumming & Brooks (2019) recognized five distinct species groups of Microphorella from the Southern Hemisphere, including the two species, each in their own group, described below from the Neotropical Region (Chile) and the Afrotropical Region (South Africa). The three other species groups occur in Australia and Southeast Asia, including New Guinea (Brooks & Cumming 2022). All four species included in the Microphorella malaysiana species group, which occurs in Southeast Asia and New Guinea, are treated in this paper even though the distribution of some species extends north of the equator. Worldwide the genus is known from various riparian, meadow and coastal habitats (Cumming & Brooks 2019).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFiscal Policies and Political EconomyFrench-language works237,207