Bibliographic record
Abstract
The tardatus species group Diagnosis. The tardatus group is diagnosed by the somewhat triangular form of the vulva and the simple, longitudinally elongated, centrally located copulatory ducts (Figs 34–35, 37–38, 42–43, 45, 50–51). Description. Medium- to large-sized spiders: carapace lengths averaging 2.6–3.1 mm (females). Males subequal. Abdomen patterned. Femora and tibiae banded or not. Two or three complete pairs of ventral tibia I macrosetae; distal pair present, absent, or incomplete. Male: Patellar apophysis (Figs 39, 47, 56) about as long as tibial width, anteriorly directed, about 25–40 peg setae. Retrolateral tibial apophysis carinate, nearly as long as tibia or slightly truncated anteriorly. Embolus (Figs 40, 48) long, thin. Distal and proximal arms of tegular apophysis species specific (Figs 40–41, 48–49, 57–61): distal arm elongated or short, proximal arm with bifid tip. Female: Atrium (Figs 33, 36, 44, 50) with paired longitudinal atrial openings, atrium hooded anteriorly (Fig. 52) or not. Copulatory ducts (Figs 35, 38, 43, 45, 51, 54) long, relatively simple, contiguous or separated. Spermathecal heads simple, small lobes or undifferentiated from rest of vulval ducts. Spermathecal stalks simple, of variable length. Spermathecal bases rounded or elongated. Bennett’s glands located on surface of bases near junction with stalks. Composition and distribution. (Fig. 62). Cybaeus orarius Bennett spec. nov., C. piazzai Bennett spec. nov., C. tardatus (Chamberlin), and C. topanga Bennett spec. nov. All four species are rarely encountered and have small ranges scattered along the southern coast of western California from southern Monterey County south to the Mexican border.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".