Lenticulella Hansen & Holmer 2011, gen. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genus Lenticulella gen. nov. Derivation of name Latin ‘ lenticularis ’, lens-shaped; refers to the lens-shaped outline. Type species. Lingulella amphora Krause & Rowell, 1975; Middle Ordovician, Dapingian; Nevada, western Newfoundland and Spitsbergen. Diagnosis. Small dorsibiconvex obolinid with lenticular outline; exterior smooth except for fine growth lines; shallow pedicle groove raised above valve floor; obscure or weakly impressed visceral area with weak median ridge in anterior part; valve floor not pitted. Remarks. Lenticulella gen. nov. is comparable only with Ovolingula Mergl, 1998 from Bohemia. Ovolingula is, however, distinguished by the presence of minute pseudointerareas with narrow pedicle groove and especially by the highly raised dorsal muscle platform and thin median septum/ridge. Species assigned. Lingulella amphora Krause & Rowell, 1975; Middle Ordovician (Orthidiella zone, Dapingian), Antelope Valley Formation, Meiklejohn Peak, Nevada; Middle Ordovician (Dapingian), Factory Cove Member, Shallow Bay Formation, western Newfoundland; Profilbekken Member, Valhallfonna Formation, northeastern Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".