Euaesthetus mundulus CASEY 1884
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Euaesthetus mundulus CASEY, 1884 (Abb. 39, 62, 82) Euaesthetus mundulus CASEY, 1884: 23; PUTHZ, 1998: 243. Euaesthetus robustulus CASEY, 1884: 24. M a t e r i a l: CANADA: ON: 1, 3: Rondeau Pr.Pk, South Point, moss on logs in pond, 2.VI.1985, Davies & Campbell (CNC); 7, 4: Tulip Tree Trail, 6.VI.1985, sifting beech & maple litter, idem (ib); 1: ibidem, end Harrison Trail, oak litter by water, 6.VI.1985, idem (ib). - NB: 3: York Co., 14 km WSW of Tracy, S of Rt. 645, 45.6755’’N, 66.8685’’W, Red maple swamp with alders, sifting moist leaf litter & moss, 4.IX.2008, Webster (cW). U.S.A.: TX: 1, 2: Orange Co., 3 mi NW Orange, 17.IV.1976, Smetana (CNC, cP); 1: Trinity Co., 12 mi SW Lufkin, 22.IV.1976, idem (ib). - LA: 2, 1: Tallulah, 12.IV.1934, Fall (MCZH, cP); 1, 1: Calcasieu Pa. 4 mi W Starks, 19.IV.1976, Smetana (CNC). - AL: 2: Monroe Co., 1 mi S Claiborne Dam, 31 o 35‘30‘‘N, 87 o 32‘, 21‘‘W, Beach / Magnolia berlese, 31.V:1995, C.E.Carlton (LSAM). - MS: 4, 12: Oktibbeha Co., Noxubee Ref., hardwood litter, 28.II., 11.III., 17.VII.1981, 5.II.1982, 21.VII.1987, Snodgrass (MSEM, cP); 1: Pontotoc Co., 1 mi SE Ecru, pitfall trap in swamp, 10.X.1980, idem (ib); 1: pitfall trap in soybean field, 18.III.1980, idem (ib).- WI: 1, 1: Sand Lake, 45 o 51’N, 91 o 29’W, 2.VIII.1998, Hammond (NHML). - MI: 1: Roscommon Co., 14.VI.1953, Dreisbach (cCornell). - IN: 8, 10: Porter Co., Beverley Shores, moss-swamp forest, 16.IV.1960, Suter (FMCh, cP). - OH: 1: Ashtabula Co., Saybrook Swamp, Saybrook Twp., sphagnum moss, 22.X.2010, J.K.Bissell (UNHD); 1, 2: Lorain Co., Columbine Twp, East River Road, channel pond berlese mosses, 19.IV.2003, H.J.Lee (UNHD). - ME: 2: York Co., West Lebanon, sphagnum, 1.V.1992, Barry (UNHD). - NH: 1, 1: Strafford Co., 1 mi SW Durham, sift litter on swamp edge; berlese grass clumps in swamp, 21.5., 30.VIII.1982, Chandler (ib); 3, 4: Chees Co., Harvard Blockdown, Pisgah St. For., leaf litter in swamp, 20.VII.1990, Chandler (ib, cP); 1, 2: Pisgah Valley Forest, sift wet grass litter, 20.VII.1990, idem (ib); 1: Merrimack Co., Exeter river 1 mi S Exeter, pitfall trap, 14.- 28.VI.1999, idem (ib). - IL: 1, 1: Union Co., Pine Hills, sifting litter at edge of cypress swamp, 14.IV.1992, Campbell (CNC). - MA: 1: "Mass." (HT, coll. Casey, USNM); 2: Cambridge, Blanchard (HT von Eu. robustulus: USNM; MCZH); 1: Tyngsborough, 15.IV.1894, idem (ib); 9, 12: Framingham, 1931-1944, Frost (MCZH, AMNH, CNC, cP); 2: Sherborn, 12.IX.1920, idem (ib, USNM); 1: Somerset, 29.III.1910, Easton (ib); 1, 1: Marion, 25.VIII.2004 (MCZH, cP); 1, 7: Middlesex Co., Eastabrook Woods near Concord, debris along stream, 15.VI.1974, 7.IV.1977, Newton (ib); 1 (cf. det.): Northamton, 8.VIII.1973, Kiteley (CNC); 1, 1: Springfield, 20.IX.1901 (ib). - RI: 3: "R.I.", coll. Casey (USNM). - CT: 1, 1: Groton, Jansson (FMCh). - NY: 1, 2: "N.Y.", coll. Casey (USNM); 1, 1: L. I., Hewlett, Shoemaker (USNM). - NJ: 1: Quirsfeld, X.1939, Quirsfeld (MCZH); 1: Arlington (cP); 1 (cf. det.): Gt Piece Meadows, 3.V.1910 (AMNH). - DC: 2, 12: Shaw Ponds, 1921-1926, Barber (USNM, cP). - VA: 2: near Plummer’s Island, 11.X.1921, Barber (USNM). - NC: 2, 2: Richmond Co., near Hamlet, Gibson Pond, mosses and litter near pond, 22.V.2004, Cornell (cCornell, cP). - SC: 2: Charlotte Co., 14 mi SW McClellan vill., F. Marion N. F. Rd. 228A, sift hardwood litter, Reeves (UNHD). - GA: 1: Liberty Co., St. Catherine Is., site 11, 31 o 36.03’N, 81 o 8.91’W, 8.IV.2004, Lott (NHML). - FL: 3, 5: Jacksonville, 12.- 17.III.1937, Bierig (FMCh, NHML, cP); 2: Niceville, 20.III.1980, Kiteley (CNC); 7, 6: Taylor Co., 11 mi NW Steinhatchee, sift rotten wood, Chandler (UNHD, cP); 1, 3: Putnam Co., Welake Exp. St., leaf litter by spring, 25.V.1983, idem (ib). B e m e r k u n g e n: Diese Art gehört zu denjenigen, deren Elytren leicht irisieren und deren Pronotum allenfalls Spuren basaler Längsfurchen aufweist. Beim Männchen ist das 8. Sternit vergleichsweise breit und ziemlich tief ausgerandet (Abb. 62). 9. Sternit apikal spitz. Aedoeagus (Abb. 39), Parameren breit mit zwei starken apikalen Borsten.. Beim Weibchen ist das 8. Sternit dreieckig verengt und apikal ganz kurz geschwungen abgerundet (Abb. 82).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".