MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968970158 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4337927

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) mesillense

2020· article· en· W6968970158 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Computing and Data Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHalictidaeDorsumMonomer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) mesillense (Cockerell, 1898) Figs 55–57, 90G, 101B, 108B Halictus nymphalis race mesillensis Cockerell, 1898b: 47 (lectotype designated herein, ♀, deposited in EMEC, examined). Halictus clarissimus Ellis, 1914b: 222 (holotype, ♀, deposited in USNM, examined) syn. nov. Halictus (Chloralictus) perexiguus Sandhouse, 1924: 26 (holotype, ♂, deposited in USNM, examined) syn. nov. Halictus mesillensis – Cockerell 1906: 429 (key). Halictus (Chloralictus) clarissimus – Sandhouse 1924: 4 (key). Halictus (Chloralictus) mesillensis – Sandhouse 1924: 4 (key). Lasioglossum (Chloralictus) clarissimum – Michener 1951: 1112 (catalog). Lasioglossum (Chloralictus) mesillense – Michener 1951: 1115 (catalog). Lasioglossum (Chloralictus) perexiguum – Michener 1951: 1116 (catalog). Dialictus clarissimus – Hurd 1979: 1965 (catalog). — Moure & Hurd 1987: 95 (catalog). Dialictus mesillensis – Hurd 1979: 1968 (catalog). — Moure & Hurd 1987: 112 (catalog). Dialictus perexiguus – Hurd 1979: 1969 (catalog). — Moure & Hurd 1987: 120 (catalog). Diagnosis Females of Lasioglossum mesillense can be recognized by the face short (length/width ratio ~0.8), frons with very fine and dense but distinctly separated punctures, clypeus with distinct apicolateral denticles, mesepisternum with dense punctures (i ≤ 1 pd) becoming crowded and weakly rugulose on the dorsal margin, T2–4 with dark spiracular spots, T1 anterior surface usually shiny, metasomal terga usually with some dense basolateral tomentum, and mesoscutum long (length/width ratio usually ±0.84). They are most similar to L. minckleyi sp. nov., L. austerum sp. nov., and L. imbriumbrae sp. nov. Females of L. minckleyi sp. nov. have the frons with crowded and indistinct punctures, mesepisternum more densely punctate ventrally (i <1 pd), T1 anterior surface coriarious, metasomal terga without tomentum, and mesoscutum broad (length/width ratio usually ≤ 0.8). Females of L. austerum sp. nov. have the head and mesosoma with more extensive dull microsculpture, mesepisternum more sparsely and distinctly punctate dorsally (i ≤ 1 pd), T1 anterior surface coriarious, and metasomal terga without tomentum. Females of L. imbriumbrae sp. nov. have the frons with crowded indistinct punctures (nearly rugulose) medially, and mesepisternum and hypoepimeron usually with dense but distinctly separated punctures throughout (i <1 pd). Males of L. mesillense can be recognized by the flagellomeres relatively long (F2 about 2 times as long as F1 and 1.6 times as long as broad), face short (length/width ratio ~0.84) and covered in dense tomentum below the ocelli, mesepisternum shiny and moderately densely punctate (i =1–2 pd), metapostnotum with relatively weak rugae not reaching the posterior margin or extending onto the dorsolateral slope, T2–3 often with basolateral tomentum, and clypeus apical margin and labrum orange to yellow. They are most similar to L. minckleyi sp. nov., L. austerum sp. nov., and L. clematisellum. Males of L. minckleyi sp. nov. have the flagellomeres relatively short (F2 about 1.6 times as long as F1 and 1.25 times as long as broad), frons with crowded and indistinct punctures, and T2–3 never with basolateral tomentum. Males of L. austerum sp. nov. have the flagellomeres relatively short (F2 about 1.75 times as long as F1 and 1.4 times as long as broad) and face with sparse tomentum. Males of L. clematisellum have the clypeus apical margin, labrum, and metasoma black, metapostnotum with strong rugae reaching the posterior margin and extending onto the dorsolateral slope, and T2–3 never with basolateral tomentum. Etymology Cockerell (1898b) named this species after the Mesilla Valley in New Mexico, where the type series was collected, plus the Latin adjectival suffix ‘- ensis ’, indicating association with a place. Material examined Lectotype UNITED STATES – New Mexico • ♀; Las Cruces; [32.32° N, 106.76° W]; 5 Aug. 1893; Cockerell leg.; EMEC 530953. [Verbatim label: Las Cruces, NM / Aug. 5 1893 (Cockerell) // stultus? // Halictus mesillensis Cockerell // Stanford University // Halictus mesillensis Ckll / Ckll // UC Berkeley / EMEC 530,953] Other material MEXICO – Baja California • 1 ♂; 12 mi. S of Palacio; [30° N, 115° W]; Apr. 1939; C.D. Michener leg.; ex Prosopis; CAS. – Chihuahua • 1 ♀; Hidalgo del Parral; [26.93° N, 105.67° W]; 31 Jul. 1967; R.C. Gardner, C.R. Kovacic and K. Lorenzen leg.; UCDC. – Sonora • 2 ♀♀; 30 km E of Agua Prieta; 31.3294° N, 109.2547° W; 24 Jul. 2001; R.L. Minckley leg.; RLM • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 18 Jul. 2001; R.L. Minckley leg.; RLM • 1 ♀; 30 km E of Agua Prieta; 31.3097° N, 109.2778° W; 6 Aug. 2004; R.L. Minckley leg.; ex Chenopodium neomexicanum; RLM • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 8 Aug. 2004; R.L. Minckley leg.; ex Salsola iberica; RLM • 1 ♀; 30 km E of Agua Prieta; 31.3297° N, 109.2558° W; 3 Apr. 2002; A. Romero leg.; RLM • 1 ♀, 2 ♂♂; Cócorit; [27.58° N, 109.96° W]; 11 Jun. 1961; F.D. Parker leg.; UCDC • 1 ♀; Municipio de Agua Prieta, Rancho Nogalitos; 31.31177° N, 108.98622° W; 25 May 2008; RLM • 2 ♀♀; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.3294° N, 109.2547° W; 5 Sep. 2001; R.L. Minckley leg.; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.3186° N, 109.2508° W; 5 Sep. 2001; R.L. Minckley leg.; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.3303° N, 109.26° W; 8 Sep. 2001; R.L. Minckley leg.; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, 28 km E of Agua Prieta, cienega transect; [31.32° N, 109.26° W]; 27 Jul. 2000; K. Toal leg.; RLM • 2 ♀♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Bosque wet, Site 1; 31.33194° N, 109.27083° W; 10 Aug. 2006; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Bosque wet, Site 6, Transect 3; 31.32957° N, 109.25462° W; 18 Sep. 2001; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Bosque wet, Site 7, Transect 2; 31.31007° N, 109.25348° W; 16 Aug. 2005; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Cafe Transect 5, Elia Thesis Study; [31.32° N, 109.26° W]; 3Aug. 2001; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Grassland, Site 3; 31.30222° N, 109.26694° W; 12 Aug. 2006; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Loma Transect 2, Elia Thesis Study; [31.32° N, 109.26° W]; 2 Aug. 2001; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Loma Transect 3, Elia Thesis Study; [31.32° N, 109.26° W]; 2Aug. 2001; RLM • 2 ♀♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Los Ojitos, Lebuhn, Bee Diversity; 31.30025° N, 109.2625° W; 3 May 2002; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Pollination Site 12, Lesquerella, Silver Creek, upstream of Big Dam; 31.3259° N, 109.28802° W; 13 Apr. 2006; ex Physaria gordonii; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Pollination Site 22, Sphaeralcea, field 3; 31.32222° N, 109.27778° W; 6 Aug. 2006; ex Laennecia coulteri; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Pollination Site 24, Lesquerella, Hay Hollow; 31.31333° N, 109.25028° W; 5 Apr. 2007; ex Salix gooddingii; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Pollination Site 27, Horse Corral, 70 m N of main ranch house; 31.32556° N, 109.26667° W; 9 Sep. 2007; ex Antennaria sp.?; RLM • 2 ♀♀; same location as for preceding; 9 Sep. 2007; ex Gaura mollis; RLM • 3 ♀♀; Rancho San Bernardino, quarry, at road crossing; 31.32042° N, 109.2681° W; 2 Sep. 2003; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, quarry, general area; 31.3195° N, 109.27028° W; 18 Aug. 2003; ex Mentzelia pumila; RLM • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 27 May 2004; ex Mentzelia pumila; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, quarry, gravel pit; 31.31964° N, 109.26926° W; 18 Aug. 2003; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, quarry, W roadside; 31.31948° N, 109.2701° W; 18 Aug. 2003; RLM • 2 ♀♀; same location as for preceding; 19 Aug. 2003; RLM • 2 ♀♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Riparian 3; 31.31389° N, 109.25028° W; 25 Aug. 2003; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Riparian, Site 2; 31.33194° N, 109.25833° W; 20 Aug. 2003; ex Baccharis sarothroides; RLM • 2 ♀♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Riparian, Site 2, Transect 1; 31.33168° N, 109.25817° W; 20 May 2004; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Riparian, Site 4, Transect 1; 31.32965° N, 109.25587° W; 8 May 2002; RLM • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 30 Apr. 2004; RLM. UNITED STATES – Arizona • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., 3 mi. W of Portal; [31.91° N, 109.19° W]; 24 Aug. 1973; R. Coville leg.; EMEC • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., 4 mi. E. Willcox; [32.25° N, 109.76° W]; 17 Aug. 1994; J.G. Rozen and J.S. Ascher leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., 4 mi. ESE of Willcox; [32.23° N, 109.77° W]; 29 Aug. 2005; J.S. Ascher leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., 5.25 km ESE of Willcox; 32.2366° N, 109.7782° W; 11 Apr. 2019; J. Gardner leg.; ex yellow mustard; WRME • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., 6 mi. S of Willcox; [32.16° N, 109.83° W]; 23 Aug. 1986; R.J. McGinley and B.M. Norden leg.; USNM • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., 9 mi. SE of Willcox; [32.16° N, 109.73° W]; 10 Jul. 1975; E.G. and J.M. Linsley leg.; EMEC • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., Chiricahua Mts, Cave Crk. Canyon; [31.89° N, 109.17° W]; 1524 m a.s.l.; 4 Aug. 1986; D.R. Corr leg.; MTEC • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., Chiricahua Mts, Portal to Ranger Stn; [31.91° N, 109.15° W]; 4 Aug. 1986; D.R. Corr leg.; MTEC • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., Coronado NF, Barfoot Meadow; 31.9176° N, 109.2793° W; 2536 m a.s.l.; 1 Jul. 2017; M.P. Argueta leg.; ex Erigeron divergens; UCRC • 1 ♂; Cochise Co., Douglas; [31.34° N, 109.51° W]; 27 Jul. 1975; E.G. and J.M. Linsley leg.; ex Tamarix chinensis; CUIC • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., 12.5 mi. N of Portal; 32.0649° N, 109.1804° W; 1 Sep. 2009; T.L. Griswold leg.; BBSL • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., Southwestern Research Station 5 mi. W of Portal; [31.884° N, 109.206° W]; 1646 m a.s.l.; 4 Jul. 1963; A.R. Moldenke and J.A. Woods leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 7 Oct. 1962; Vincent Roth leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 18 Apr. 1963; Vincent Roth leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR; 31.335° N, 109.2528° W; 18 Jul. 2001; R. Minckley leg.; PCYU • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR; 31.3353° N, 109.2514° W; 30 Mar. 2002; R.L. Minckley leg.; PCYU • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR; 31.3381° N, 109.2606° W; 8 Sep. 2001; R.L. Minckley leg.; PCYU • 2 ♀♀; same location as for preceding; 8 Sep. 2001; R.L. Minc

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.214
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.124 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicScientific Computing and Data ManagementFrench-language works237,207