MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968973138 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5157309

UTILIZATION OF TIERED- BASED MODULAR INSTRUCTION AND THE AQUACULTURE SKILLS OF GRADE 10 TECHNICAL VOCATIONAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

2021· article· en· W6968973138 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal Management and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAquacultureVocational educationModular designQuarter (Canadian coin)PerceptionSoft skills

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study entitled “Utilization of Tiered- Based Modular Instruction and the Aquaculture Skills of Grade 10 Technical Vocational Students” aimed to determine the students’ perceptions on the utilization of tieredbased modular instruction and its relationship to the aquaculture skills of the learners through the use and analysis of self-made questionnaire and pre- and post-test results. The respondents of the study were the 31 Grade 10 students in Aquaculture during the school year 2020- 2021 at Tanauan School of Fisheries. They are assessed according to their first quarter grades or performances and classified according to their capacity namely: challenged, average, and advance learners. The study utilized survey questionnaire and pre and post-test to gather the data needed in the research and been sent thru their group chats using Google forms link. These instruments were validated first by experts in the field of Aquaculture before being utilized by the respondents. Findings revealed that there is a significant increase in the pre-test and posttest scores of the student- respondents in terms of their aquaculture skills after the utilization of the tieredbased modular instruction. The hypothesis stating that there is no significant increase in the level of performance of the students after the utilization of tiered- based modular instruction were now not sustained. And after all the data gathered and calculated, the result reveals that there is no significant relationship between the respondents- related variable and their aquaculture skills. The hypothesis stating that there is no significant relationship between the respondents’ related variable and the aquaculture skills of students were supported by evidences and therefore sustained. On the other hand, the result also shows that the perception of the student- respondents in the utilization of tiered- based modular instruction and their aquaculture skills were not significantly related to each other. Thus, the hypothesis stating that there is no significant relationship between the respondent’s perception on Tiered- Based Modular Instruction and Aquaculture skills of students is also sustained. It revealed that when the independent and dependent variables were computed against 0.01 level and 0.05 level of significance, the result showed that they were not significantly related with each other.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.861
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it