MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6968974421 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6869748

Sorex palustris J. Richardson 1828

2018· article· en· W6968974421 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubspeciesShrewSubgenusSorexBayWhite (mutation)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

77. American Water Shrew Sorex palustris French: Musaraigne palustre / German: Amerikanische Wasserspitzmaus / Spanish: Musgano americano Other common names: Vater Shrew Taxonomy. Sorex palustris J. Richardson, 1828, “ Marshy places, from Hudson's Bay to the Rocky Mountains,” Canada. Sorex palustris is in the S. palustris group and subgenus Otisorex along with S. albibarbis, S. alaskanus, S. navigator, and S. bendiri. It previously included S. albibarbis and S. navigator as subspecies, but genetic and morphological data support both as distinct species, although additional studies are needed to morphologically distinguish S. albibarbis. Sorex palustris is sister to S. albibarbis, and S. navigator is sister to S. bendi- rii. The S. palustris group is closely related to the S. montanus group and the S. sonomae group, but their exact relationships are uncertain. Distributional limits between S. palustris, S. navigator, and S. albibarbis are still very uncertain, and because of this, much of the ecological data cannot be reliably attributed to any of the three species. Thus, all ecological data for S. albibarbis, S. navigator, and S. palustris are presented under S. palustris here. Two subspecies recognized. Subspecies and Distribution. S.p.palustris|.Richardson,1828—fromEBritishColumbiaandSNorthwestTerritoriesEtoCOntario(Canada)andStoNorthDakotaandMinnesota(NCUSA). S. p. hydrobadistes H. H. T.Jackson, 1926 — from E South Dakota E to Michigan (NC USA). Descriptive notes. Head-body 62-98 mm, tail 58-71 mm, hindfoot 17-21 mm; weight 8:7-20 g. The American Water Shrew is a large semi-aquatic shrew. Pelage is highly variable; dorsum is generally blackish brown and occasionally flecked with white, giving grizzled appearance. Venter is silvery white to buffy brown. Occasionally, there is a nearly all blackish form, with lighter throat and chest, although this is rare. Feet are large and broad, and hindfeet are partially webbed and have small white hairs protruding on their sides. Tail is long, somewhat laterally flattened, and bicolored, dark blackish brown above and lighter below, with small tip of fur at end. Skull hasrelatively shorter unicuspid toothrow, largerfirst unicuspid, and shorter rostrum compared with the Western Water Shrew (S. navigator). Teeth are pigmented dark red. There are five unicuspids, third is smaller than fourth, and fifth is much smaller. Habitat. Around streams, ponds, lakes, swamps, marshes, and bogs. American Water Shrews are most common around small streams with dense overhanging riparian vegetation. Although they are most commonly associated with water, individuals have been captured far from water sources, probably dispersing individuals. They are often associated with areas with at least 75% ground cover, providing protection while foraging. American Water Shrews are often associated with North American Beavers (Castor canadensis) because their dams create more marsh edge habitat with moving water and moist humus. Food and Feeding. American Water Shrews eat a large variety ofterrestrial and aquatic prey. Slugs and earthworms make up large proportions of their diets, along with plant material, Endogone fungi, aquatic insect larvae (stoneflies, mayflies, caddisflies, etc.), and otherterrestrial insects. They are also known to eat carrion of dead mice and will take small fish, tadpoles, and larval California giant salamanders (Dicamptodon ensatus). In hatchery ponds, they occasionally eat fish eggs. When food is plentiful, they will cache it in their tunnels, sometimes defecating on it to stop others from taking it. Breeding. Testicular enlargement in male American Water Shrews occurs in December or January; ovarian activity has been recorded as early as January. Reproduction occurs from February until about August in Montana, although breeding season probably varies by region. Females generally have 2-3 litters/year, and few individuals breed in the same year they are born, although it does occur in some individuals born earlier in the season. Litters have 3-10 young based on embryo counts. Females have postpartum estrus. Activity patterns. American Water Shrews are semi-aquatic. They are active day and night, although activity is highest during sunset and sunrise. Throughout the day, they have 1-5hour rhythms during which they spend 30 minutes active and 57 minutes sleeping. Active periods are spent foraging for food and exploring surroundings on land and in water. They are very capable swimmers and use their hindlegs to propel themselves through the water. They are also able to walk on water for short periods of time using the air bubbles trapped under hairs on their hindfeet, although mechanisms behind this need to be better studied. They forage underwater by poking and probing rocks and crevices on bottoms of streams. American Water Shrews seem to use their sense of touch and smell to find prey, but sight might also be important. Because a layer of air surrounds them while swimming, they float easily, which makes it difficult for them to stay underwater. Their fur also starts to get wet after a few minutes, and because of this, they come ashore and dry themselves off after each dive. They dry their fur with their hindfeet for ¢.10-30 seconds before entering the water again. On land, American Water Shrews use regular trails and tunnels to get around and get into the water and might sometimes block entrances to tunnels with sticks or dirt. Tunnels of deermice (Peromyscus sp.) are often used instead of creating their own. American Water Shrews build nests near banks of streams or ponds. Nests are constructed in tunnels, in logs, or under logs, and are formed by collected grasses and other vegetation, forming a depression, and stitching walls together with the mouth to form a somewhat dome-shaped nest. Movements, Home range and Social organization. American Water Shrews are largely solitary and protect elongated territories along stream or pond edges from conspecifics. Home ranges are relatively small and have been estimated at 0-2-0-3 ha. When two American Water Shrews meet each other, a brief and sometimes intense fight occurs. Generally, however, one shrew backs down after the initial threat, although when neither shrew backs down, fighting is inevitable. Fights generally begin with both shrews emitting high-frequency squeaks c¢.3-5 cm apart. If neither backs down, they will rise onto their hindlegs and lash out with forefeet. If they continue to fight, they will end up in a tight ball, scratching and biting at each other until one gives up and runs away. The winner chases the loser away and is more likely to attack another shrew it meets; the loser is generally wearier about picking fights thereafter. Status and Conservation. Classified as Least Concern on The IUCN Red List. American Water Shrews are overall not threatened, but localized water pollution and habitat destruction are detrimental because they rely so heavily on aquatic environments. Bibliography. Beneski & Stinson (1987), Catania (2006), George (1988), Gusztak & Campbell (2004), Himes & Kenagy (2010), Hope et al. (2014), Mycroft et al. (2011), Nagorsen et al. (2017), Sorenson (1962), Whitaker & Schmeltz (1973).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAmphibian and Reptile Biology→French-language works237,207→