MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6968982219 · doi:10.5683/sp3/djyu6f

ABoVE: Wetland Inundation Coverage at Yukon Flats, AK and PA Delta, Canada, 2017-2019

2024· dataset· en· W6968982219 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWetlandVegetation (pathology)Hydrology (agriculture)Water equivalentOpen waterHigh resolution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This record is for the dataset “ABoVE: Wetland Inundation Coverage at Yukon Flats, AK and PA Delta, Canada, 2017-2019” at https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1901 This dataset provides time series of wetland inundation coverage maps and corresponding inundation frequency maps at ~10-meter resolution estimated every 12 days during the free-water period (May to October) for the years 2017-2019 over the Yukon Flats (YK) portion of the Yukon River, Alaska, USA, and the Peace-Athabasca Delta (PAD), Alberta, Canada. Wetland inundation coverage was determined by a two-step modified decision-tree classification approach that first used Sentinel-1 C-band SAR to identify likely inundated areas across a study site and was followed by a decision-tree classification step with C-band SAR backscatter statistics thresholds to distinguish among different inundation components. The result of this process was five classes for each inundation map, namely Open Water (OW), Floating Plants (FP), Emergent Plants (EP), Flooded Vegetation (FV), and Dry Land (DRY). After all the individual (every 12 days) inundation coverage maps were derived for a study site, they were generalized to two-class maps which maintained only inundation status. These generalized maps were then stacked and summarized to produce the inundation frequency map for the site. In these maps, higher values signify more frequently inundated areas, with the maximum value representing permanently inundated pixels. The Sentinel-1 inundation mapping capability demonstrated here provided frequent, broad-scale mapping of different wetland inundation components. Integration of such products with process-based methane (CH4) models would improve simulation of CH4 emissions from wetlands. This dataset can be downloaded at https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1901

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→French-language works237,207→