MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968985039 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5248549

Clytia hemisphaerica

2012· article· en· W6968985039 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation Systems Education and Curriculum Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrange (colour)Sympatric speciationHolotypeTaxonomy (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clytia hemisphaerica (Linnaeus, 1767) Fig. 48 Medusa hemisphaerica Linnaeus, 1767: 1098 [medusa stage]. Clytia johnstoni.— Segerstedt, 1889: 11, 25.— Jäderholm, 1909: 61, pl. 5, fig. 12. Clytia hemisphaerica.— Rees & Rowe, 1969: 16.— Cornelius, 1982: 75, fig. 9k.— Östman, 1999: 17. Campanularia johnstoni.— Jägerskiöld, 1971: 61. Clytia hemisphaerica form (or forma) johnstoni.— Östman, 1979a: 5; 1979b: 127, figs. 1, 2, 4, 5; 1982a: 156; 1983: 6. Type locality. “ Habitat in Oceano Belgico ” (Linnaeus 1767: 1098). Museum material. Kosterhavet, 58°50.278’N, 11°02.680’E, 13 m, 07.ix.2010, biological dredge, R / V Nereus, on algae, one stolonal colony, without gonophores, ROMIZ B3894.— Kosterhavet, 58°53.093’N, 11°05.668’E, 20– 30 m, 09.ix.2010, biological dredge, R / V Nereus, on algae, one stolonal colony, with gonophores, ROMIZ B3907.— Saltö naturreservat, outer ledge, 58°52’40”N, 11°06’53”E, <1 m, 11.ix.2010, collected manually, on red algae, two stolonal colonies, with gonophores, ROMIZ B3923.— Väderöarna, 58°34.931’N, 11°04.931’E, 121– 50 m, 13.ix.2010, biological dredge, R / V Nereus, on antenna of a decapod crustacean, one colony, with a few branched pedicels, up to 9 mm high, with gonophores, ROMIZ B3930. Remarks. A comprehensive taxonomic overview of Clytia hemisphaerica (Linnaeus, 1767) was given by Cornelius (1982), and additional details were provided by Calder (1991). The sympatric C. gracilis (M. Sars, 1850) is similar, but its gonothecae have smooth rather than spirally ribbed walls. Nematocysts of the two species also differ (Östman 1979a). Östman added that colonies of C. gracilis are often branched, and hydrothecal cusps are sharppointed, whereas colonies of C. hemsphaerica are usually unbranched, and hydrothecal cusps are broad and symmetrical. Comments on C. gigantea (Hincks, 1866), sometimes included as a synonym, are given above. Although C. hemisphaerica is generally reported to be virtually cosmopolitan, Cornelius (1995b: 254) is probably correct that “nearly all” records of species of the taxonomically difficult genus Clytia Lamouroux, 1812 are suspect. Clytia hemisphaerica has been reported numerous times along the west coast of Sweden (see Checklist). Hydroids of the species die back during winter in nearby waters of Denmark (Kramp 1935b: 100, as Campanularia johnstoni Alder, 1856) and the Oslofjord, Norway (Christiansen 1972: 293–294, as Clytia johnstoni). Reported distribution. West coast of Sweden.—From the border with Norway to southern Kattegat (Jägerskiöld 1971). Elsewhere.—North Atlantic from Svalbard and Finnmark to the Mediterranean Sea in Europe (Christiansen 1972; Cornelius 1982), and from Labrador to Florida in North America (Calder 2004). Reported to be circumglobal (Calder 1991).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it