MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968995416 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5829632

Laboulbenia clivinalis Thaxt.

2021· article· en· W6968995416 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenusAntheridiumAppendageCzechThallus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laboulbenia clivinalis Thaxt. MB#140929 Fig. 27A–B Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 35: 165 (Thaxter 1899). – Type: “ On Clivina collaris Herbst, Brit. Mus. No. 456, … England ”; FH. [type, according to Thaxter 1908: 408] Laboulbenia henricii S.Colla (Colla1926: 185) [Not registered in MycoBank] Diagnostic features Cell V wedge-shaped, as long or longer and as broad as cell IV, connected with cell III. Outer appendage branched once or more times above a variably darkened suprabasal cell; septum separating basal and suprabasal cells oblique and blackened (Fig. 27B, arrows). Inner appendage consisting of a basal cell which is half as long as the outer basal cell, in young thalli bearing 2–3 simple and short branches with solitary terminal antheridium (Fig. 27B), later proliferating into a variable number of sterile branches in mature thalli (Fig. 27A). [Detailed descriptions: Thaxter 1908; Cépède & Picard 1908; Majewski 1994b; Santamaria 1998] Distribution and hosts On species of the genus Clivina (Col. Carabidae) in many countries in Europe: Bulgaria, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom (Santamaria et al. 1991), Belgium (De Kesel 1995), Lithuania (Markovskaja 2000), Czech Republic (Rossi & Máca 2006), Latvia (De Kesel & Krastina De Kesel 2006), the Netherlands (Haelewaters et al. 2012), and Austria (Rossi & Christian 2020). Also in Africa: Algeria, Cameroon; Asia: Burma, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam (Santamaria et al. 1991), China and Cambodia (Kong et al. 2020); and recently reported from America: Canada and USA (Haelewaters et al. 2019b). The record from China by Shen & Ye (2006) is wrong according to Kong et al. (2020). Collections examined from Denmark On Clivina fossor (Linnaeus, 1758) (Col. Carabidae) DENMARK – Fyn (F) • Gyldenstens inddaemmede Strand; 55°34.447′ N, 10°7.211′ E; NG75; 2 Apr. 2014; JP 697; JP det.; ZMUC C-F-123186. – Lolland, Falster, Møn (LFM) • Krenkerup Haveskov; 54°46.408′ N, 11°39.955′ E; PF77; 5 May 1993; S. Langemark & O.E. Meyer 99; JP det.; ZMUC C-F-122574. – Nordøstsjaelland (NEZ) • Espergaerde; 56°0.591′ N, 12°33.074′ E; UC40; 24 May 2016; M.H. Post 358; JP det.; ZMUC C-F-122840 • Kagsmose; 55°42.698′ N, 12°27.378′ E; UB47; 12 Mar. 2015; H. Liljehult 97; JP det.; ZMUC C-F-122572 • ibid.; 26 May 2015; H. Liljehult 28; JP det.; ZMUC C-F-122501. – Nordvestjylland (NWJ) • Nord for Landting ved Vinderup; 56°30.049′ N, 8°45.384′ E; MH86; 19 Jan. 2015; JP 567; JP det.; ZMUC C-F-123053 • Vest for Vinderup; 56°28.727′ N, 8°44.810′ E; MH85; 19 Jan. 2015; JP 770; JP det.; ZMUC C-F-123265. – Nordvestsjaelland (NWZ) • Garbølle; 55°34.107′ N, 11°34.293′ E; PG66; 21 Apr. 2018; JP 1061; JP det.; ZMUC C-F-123578. – Sydsjaelland (SZ) • Gammel Kalvehave; 54°59.745′ N, 12°8.232′ E; UA19; 25 Apr. 2019; JP 1440; JP det.; ZMUC C-F-123987 • Østerskov ved Langebaek; 54°59.572′ N, 12°6.715′ E; UA19; 3 Jan. 2019; JP 1276; JP det.; ZMUC C-F-123806 • Tryggevaelde Å ved Varpelev; 55°21.055′ N, 12°15.877′ E; UB23; 6 Jan. 2018; JP 961; JP det.; ZMUC C-F-123467. Remarks First record from Denmark where its presence was expected given the wide distribution of this species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomyFrench-language works237,207