Bibliographic record
Abstract
Banasa dimidiata (Say, 1831a) New state records: Alabama: Baldwin Co.: Gulf Shores St. Pk., 17-V-1985, E. G. Riley & D. A. Rider (1♂ DAR). Cleburne Co.: Shoal Creek Ford, 6 mi. NNW Edwardsville, 23-VII-1965, J. & L. Donahue, det. J. E. McPherson (1♀ MSUC). Hale Co.: near Payne Lake, 11 mi. S Duncanville, 22-VII-1965, J. & L. Donahue, det. J. E. McPherson (1♂ MSUC). Lee Co.: [no specific locality], 22-VI-1981, D. A. Rider (1♂ DAR), 24-VI-1982, D. A. Rider (1♀ DAR). Tuscaloosa Co.: University, 1935, A. F. Archer (1♂ UMMZ). South Carolina: Pickens Co.: Clemson, 1-VII-1959 [additional dates: 13-VII-1958, 20-VII-1958, 29-VIII-1958], R. C. Fox, det. J E. McPherson (2♂♂ 2♀♀ MSUC). Wyoming: Albany Co.: Rock Creek Trail, 15-VI-2007, W. K. Reeves (1♀ DAR). Distribution: Canada: AB, BC, MB, NB (Brown 1941, Maw et al. 2000, Roch 2020), NS, ON, PE (Maw et al. 2000, Roch 2020), QC, SK (Walley 1929). United States: AL, AR, AZ (Thomas & Yonke 1981, Jones 1993), CA, CO, CT (Parshley 1917, 1923a; O’Donnell & Schaefer 2012), DC, DE (Schrader & Hughes-Schrader 1958), FL, GA, IA, ID (Harris & Shull 1944), IL, IN, KS (Packauskas 2012), LA, MA, MD, ME (Parshley 1914, 1917; Johnson 1927; Phipps 1930; Roch 2020), MI, MN (Koch et al. 2014), MO, MS (Lago & Testa 2000), MT (Van Duzee 1917), NC, ND, NE, NH (Slosson 1896, Parshly 1917, Roch 2020), NJ, NM, NY, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI (Parshley 1917), SC, SD (Parshley 1922, Harris 1937), TN (Lambdin et al. 2003, Vlach et al. 2010), TX, UT, VA, VT (Roch 2020), WV, WA, WI, WY. (Mexico) Comments: Say (1831a) originally used dimiata as the specific epithet for this species, which was emended to the present form by LeConte (1859). This was probably unjustified, hence the listing of this species as Banasa dimiata in Froeschner (1988), but Hoffman (2005) provided arguments for maintaining the use of Banasa dimidiata for reasons of stability. Thomas & Yonke (1981) characterized the range of this species as “Entire U.S., northern Mexico and southern Canada ”, but they did not give any specific state localities. This species was also recorded from Alabama, Maine, and Minnesota in an unpublished thesis (Simons 1969).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".