MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6969009119 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5968464

Diphasia clarae Fraser 1911

2018· article· en· W6969009119 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeType localityArchipelagoTaxonomy (biology)Type (biology)Cave

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diphasia clarae Fraser, 1911 Hydrallmania distans Nutting, 1899: 746, pl. 63, figs. 3A–D. Diphasia clarae Fraser, 1911: 64, pl. 5, fig. 1. Syntype. USNM 70860: USA, Washington, San Juan Islands, one colony on Lafoea sp., coll. T. Kincaid; ethanol. Lectotype, by present designation. USNM 70860: USA, Washington, San Juan Islands, one colony, ca. 8 mm high, on Lafoea sp., in fairly good condition, without gonophores, coll. T. Kincaid; ethanol. Type locality. USA, Washington: San Juan Archipelago (Fraser 1911). Current status. Invalid. Remarks. Diphasia clarae was originally described by Fraser (1911) from specimens collected in both Washington state, USA (San Juan Archipelago) and British Columbia, Canada (Queen Charlotte Islands, now called Haida Gwaii). No name-bearing types were designated by him for the species. A hydroid colony at the NMNH (USNM 70860) from one of the two original type localities, and in a collection (by Trevor Kincaid) that Fraser examined during his study (Fraser 1911: 4), would have been part of the type series of D. clarae. Although no other specimens from the type series are known to exist, we designate it as the lectotype rather than the holotype by monotypy (ICZN Recommendation 73F). A single sample of specimens identified as D. clarae exists in the Fraser Hydroid Collection at the RBCM (BCPM 976-00544-001: Horswell Channel, 17 October 1912, 15- 18 m) (Arai 1977), but it was collected subsequent to the original description of the species and does not constitute type material. Our lectotype designation restricts the type locality of D. clarae to the San Juan Archipelago, Washington, USA. Subsequently assigned to the synonymy of Hydrallmania distans Nutting, 1899 by Fraser (1914a: 108, 185), the binomen Diphasia clarae was abandoned in later comprehensive works on hydroids by him (Fraser 1937a, 1947a). The figures and captions of plates 5 and 6 in Fraser’s (1911) paper, in which Diphasia clarae was described, were reversed. The figure of the species is on plate 5 and not plate 6, as indicated in the text.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy→French-language works237,207→