MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6969013757 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6707093

Microtus oregoni

2017· article· en· W6969013757 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrotusSubspeciesVoleShearwaterHabitatHome range

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

151. Creeping Vole Microtus oregoni French: Campagnol de I'Oregon / German: Oregon-Wihimaus / Spanish: Topillo de Oregén Other common names: Oregon Meadow Mouse, Oregon Vole Taxonomy. Arvicola oregoni Bachman, 1839, Astoria, Clatsop County, Oregon, USA. Four subspecies are recognized. Subspecies and Distribution. M.o.oregon:Bachman,1839—WWashington,WOregon,andNWCalifornia,USA. M.o.adocetusMerriam,1908—extremeSCOregonandNCCalifornia,USA. M.o.bairdiMerriam,1897—SCOregonandextremeNCCalifornia,USA. M. o. serpens Merriam, 1897 — SW British Columbia, Canada. Descriptive notes. Head-body 97-112 mm, tail 32-42 mm, ear 9-10 mm, hindfoot 19-19 mm; weight averages 19 g. The Creeping Vole is one of the smallest species of Microtusin North America and has a very shorttail. Pelage is dense, soft, and sooty gray to yellowish brown on back; venter is dusky. Tail is indistinctly bicolored, and ears are small, blackish and lightly haired. Hindfeet have five plantar tubercles. Molars are small, M? has 2-3 closed triangles, M, has five closed triangles, and M, has three transverse loops. Habitat. Dry short-grass habitats in coniferous forests. Clearcut disturbed sites and areas where timber slash has been burned support higher densities of Creeping Voles because of the herbaceous-dominated vegetation. Food and Feeding. Diets of Creeping Voles primarily include herbaceous vegetation (forbs and grass) and fungi. Captive individuals have survived on bluegrass, clover, and apples. Breeding. Breeding of Creeping Volesis reportedly year-round but mostly in March— September. Gestation is ¢.23 days, and 4-5 litters with 3-4 young each are produced annually. Young are born in nests of dry grass placed in cavities under logs or in similarly protected sites. Activity patterns. Creeping Voles are terrestrial. Movements, Home range and Social organization. It is unknown if Creeping Voles undergo large multiannual population fluctuations, as often recorded for other species of Microtus. They are known to tunnel but not exclusively, and they often use aboveground runways. Home ranges are 0-05-0-38 ha for males and 0-04—0-23 ha for females; they decrease in size through summer. Densities have been reported as high as 138 ind/ha at the northern edge of the distribution in British Columbia, but much lower in the south. Status and Conservation. Classified as Least Concern on The IUCN Red List. Bibliography. Bradley, Ammerman et al. (2014), Carraway & Verts (1985), Cowan & Arsenault (1954), Hall (1981), Hooven (1973), Musser & Carleton (2005), Verts & Carraway (1988).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyFrench-language works237,207