Microvelia pulchella Westwood 1834
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microvelia pulchella Westwood, 1834 Microvelia pulchella Westwood, 1834: Annls. Soc. Ent. Fr., Plate 6, Fig. 5. Material examined. Laguna Iberá RS: 4 ♂, 4 ♀, Iberá Lagoon, Fraga pier, 28°31’50.00’’S, 57°11’13.68’’W, 3.xii.2012. Yahaveré RS: 1 ♀, Concepción de Yaguareté Corá, house for researchers, swimming pool, 28°23’25.7”S, 57°53’15.9”W, 8.xi.2015. General distribution. Canada, USA, Mexico, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Panama, the Greater Antilles, the Lesser Antilles, Colombia, Venezuela, French Guiana, Brazil, Ecuador, Peru, Argentina (Moreira et al. 2011b; Pacheco-Chaves et al. 2014; Motta et al. 2018). Habitat. Microvelia pulchella lives in a wide range of aquatic habitats. It is usually associated with dense vegetation in unshaded areas of lentic habitats (ponds, lakes, puddles in drains, pools by waterfalls, lagoons, roadside ditches, sloughs, fens, swamps, marshes and dams) (Nieser & Alkins-Koo 1991; Taylor & McPherson 1999; Pelli et al. 2006; Franco et al. 2021; Rodrigues et al. 2021b) and of lotic habitats (streams and rivers) in standing or slowmoving water (Melo & Nieser 2004; Pereira & Melo 2007; Moreno-R et al. 2018; Franco et al. 2021; Rodrigues et al. 2021b). It has also been found on brackish water in the Lesser Antilles (Cobben 1960) and in a swimming pool (Melo & Nieser 2004). This species can live in pools in caves in complete darkness in Cuba (Nieser 1973). At the INR, specimens were collected from the margins of the Iberá Lagoon in shallow waters with emergent and floating vegetation (Estévez et al. 2003). During the present study, this species was collected together with M. hinei from margins with dense floating, emergent and submerged vegetation in Iberá Lagoon. One specimen was collected together with M. mimula in a swimming pool in Concepción de Yaguareté Corá.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".