MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6969050316 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5020578

Leptusa (Adoxopisalia) opaca Casey 1893

2010· article· en· W6969050316 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaHead (geology)Synonym (taxonomy)AppendageSmooth surface

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leptusa (Adoxopisalia) opaca Casey, 1893 (Figs. 1 a, 2a – k, Map 1) Leptusa opaca Casey, 1893: 364; Fenyes, 1920: 123; Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz, 1926: 555; Pace, 1989: 130; Gusarov, 2003: 118; Klimaszewski et al., 2005: 46; Klimaszewski et al., 2007: 815, 826; Gouix & Klimaszewski, 2007: 61. Leptusa seminitens Casey, 1893: 364; Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz, 1926: 555 (as synonym of L. opaca). Material examined (n=2). U.S. A: Tennessee: Sevier Co.: ɗ, GSMNP, Twin Creeks, FIT #1, 26 June – 1 July 2001, C. Carlton, V. Moseley, A. Tishechkin (LSAM); North Carolina: Haywood Co.: Ψ (slide mounted), GSMNP, AHSLC @ Purchase Knob, FIT, 17S 312021 3940123, 17 August 2005, T. Grannan (GSMNP). Redescription. Length 3.1 – 3.2 mm. Head, pronotum, and elytra blackish brown; antennomeres 1 – 2, 11, mouthparts, tibia, tarsus, and posterior part of abdominal tergites II – V yellowish brown; femora brown (Fig. 1 a). Head opaque, pubescent, with microsculpture. Antennomeres 1 – 3 elongate, 4 – 5 longer than wide, 6 – 7 subquadrate, and 8 – 10 transverse (Fig. 2 a). Carina on each side of ventral surface of head complete, attaining gular suture. Mouthparts. Labrum transverse, bearing 3 pairs of short setae, and 7 pairs of long setae, a-seta, b-seta, and many pores (Fig. 2 b). Labium with two distal setae in a longitudinal row, and several pores in median area; a pair of setal pores, 2 pairs of real pores and several pseudopores present in lateral area (Fig. 2 c). Labial palpi bearing 12 setae (a – h, α – δ), γ-, δ-seta at least three times longer than α-, β-seta (Fig. 2 d). Mentum trapezoidal, bearing 4 pairs of main setae (b, u, v, w), and 3 pairs of additional setae; many pores present in middle area (Fig. 2 e). Thorax. Pronotum approximately 1.61 times wider than long, pubescent, opaque, with microsculpture. Mesoventrite with distinct reticulate microsculpture. Metaventrite with setigerous punctures. Elytra wider than pronotum and abdomen, approximately 1.62 times longer than wide, approximately 1.95 times longer than pronotum, latero-posterior margin emarginate, opaque, and pubescent. Hind wings present. Abdomen. Abdomen glossy, as wide as elytra. Abdominal tergite VI approximately 1.79 times wider than long; tergites VII – VIII with single median elongate tubercle (Fig. 2 f); tergite VIII with posterior margin shallowly emarginate, bearing 4 pairs of main setae, and many additional short setae and pores (Fig. 2 f). Male abdominal sternite VIII with posterior margin produced and approximately bearing 15–16 main setae, and many additional short setae and pores (Fig. 2 g). Female abdominal tergite VIII with posterior margin shallowly emarginate, bearing 4 pairs of main setae, and many additional short setae and pores (Fig. 2 h). Genitalia. Paramere as in Fig. 2 i. Median lobe as in Fig. 2 j. Spermatheca as in Fig. 2 k. Type locality. Leptusa opaca: Pennsylvania. Distribution. CANADA: New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, Quebec; USA: Arkansas, Georgia, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Wisconsin. Locations where L. opaca has been collected in GSMNP as in Map 1. Habitat. Both specimens were collected from secondary forests during mid to late summer using flight intercept traps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicColeoptera Taxonomy and DistributionFrench-language works237,207