MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6969064435 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5162580

Podisus serieventris Uhler 1871

2021· article· en· W6969064435 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShoreState (computer science)AntipodesBall (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Podisus serieventris Uhler, 1871 New state record: Louisiana: Winn Par.: Winnfield, 12-V-1918, G. R. Pilate, det. Phillips (2♀♀ UMMZ). Oregon: Lincoln Co.: Fall Creek, ca. 8 mi. W. of Alsea, on shore of pond, 5-IX-2002, G. L. Parsons (1♀ MSUC). Umatilla Co.: Meacham, 15-VI-1938, E. C. Van Dyke (1♀ DAR). Distribution: Canada: BC, MB (Walley 1929, Brown 1941), NB (Maw et al. 2000, Roch 2020), NF, NS, NT (Maw et al. 2000), ON, PE (Maw et al. 2000, Roch 2020), QC, SK (Maw et al. 2000). United States: CA (Dahlsten et al. 1977, Mason 1981), CO, CT (Parshley 1917, 1923a; O’Donnell & Schaefer 2012), FL, IA (Osborn & Ball 1897, Stoner 1916), ID, IL, IN, LA, MA, ME, MI (Hart 1919, Furth 1974), MN, MO (Froeschner 1941), MT, NC, ND (Rider 2012), NH, NJ (Smith 1910), NM, NY, OH, OR, PA, RI (Parshley 1917), UT, VA (Hoffman 1971), WA (Zack et al. 2012), WY (Hart 1919). (Mexico) Comments: Phillips (1983) provided locality data that confirms the above records from California, Connecticut, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, North Dakota, Oregon, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming; she also included records from Arizona, the District of Columbia, Georgia, Kentucky, and Maryland, which would constitute new records.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior→French-language works237,207→