Micropygomyia (Coquillettimyia) oppidana
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Micropygomyia (Coquillettimyia) oppidana (Dampf, 1944) oppidana Dampf, 1944: 247 (as Phlebotomus oppidanus). Type locality: Mexico, Distrito Federal, San Jacinto. Phlebotomus oppidanus Dampf: Barretto (1947, catalogue), Vargas & Díaz-Nájera (1953b, Mexican distribution), Fairchild & Hertig (1957, taxonomy), Fairchild & Hertig (1959, listed, distribution), Fairchild & Harwood (1961, keys), Fairchild & Hertig (1961a, cf. to Ph. vargasi), Eads et al. (1965, listed), Harwood (1965, USA records), Ortiz (1965b, listed), Quate (1965, Nearctic catalogue), Easton et al. (1967, mentioned), Easton et al. (1968, mentioned), Downes (1972, as Phlebotomus, listed). Lutzomyia oppidana (Dampf): Barretto (1962), Theodor (1965, as Lutzomyia species group Vexatrix), Rosabal & Miller (1970, keys), Young (1972, listed), Martins & Morales-Frías (1972, as Lutzomyia, listed), Williams (1999, listed as species group Vexator, distribution). Lutzomyia (Lutzomyia) oppidana (Dampf): Forattini (1971, listed), Forattini (1973, redescription, keys). Lutzomyia (Helcocyrtomyia) oppidana (Dampf): Martins et al. (1978, distribution), Young & Perkins (1984, taxonomy, distribution), Young & Duncan (1994, taxonomy, keys), Ibáñez-Bernal (2000 a, 2003, taxonomy, Mexican records), Ibáñez-Bernal (2005a, 2005b, keys), Ibáñez-Bernal et al. (2006, Veracruz records). Micropygomyia (Coquillettimyia) oppidana (Dampf): Galati (2003, listed, keys), Ibáñez-Bernal et al. (2011, Veracruz records), Shimabukuro et al. (2017, list, distribution), Galati (2018, listed, keyed), Galati (2021, classification, keys). General distributio n. Canada, Mexico, United States of America (Shimabukuro et al. 2017; Galati 2018, 2021). Distribution in Mexic o. Distrito Federal (= currently Ciudad de México) (Dampf 1944), Nuevo León (Martins et al. 1978), Nayarit (Ibáñez-Bernal 2003; Godínez-Álvarez & Ibáñez-Bernal 2010), Veracruz (Ibáñez-Bernal et al. 2006, 2011).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".