MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6969074238 · doi:10.5284/1099726

The Small House, Temple Close, Watford, Herts. Archaeological Monitoring

2010· article· en· W6969074238 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild Abuse and Trauma
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRubbleBrickPotteryRedevelopmentDemolitionWorld heritageExcavation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the result of a condition on the planning consent for the redevelopment of The Small House, Temple Close, Watford, the Heritage Network was commissioned by the owner to undertake the archaeological investigations of the site. The present site is located on the site of the demolished Cassiobury House, which underwent a number of phases of alteration and rebuilding. An earlier evaluation across the footprints of the two proposed new dwellings revealed evidence for a series of wall footings and a vaulted brick undercroft relating to the 19th century rebuilding of the house. A gravel surface and associated brick edging were also exposed, which may form part of the courtyard in front of the main entrance to the 19th century house. A single sherd of medieval pottery was also recovered. Prior to starting the present phase of works on the site, the decision was made to proceed with the construction of a single dwelling only, located to the west of the existing house, which was to be demolished as part of the works. During the course of the groundworks for this building, the full extent of the octagonal kitchen that formed part of James Wyatt's rebuilding of Cassiobury House in the early 19th century, was exposed. The walls forming the northern end of the west range of the house were also revealed. The area between the walls of the west range was formed of demolition rubble that proved to have been used to backfill a series of cellars. Because of their location beneath the footprint of the new dwelling, they were partially cleared of rubble and it was decided that they should be incorporated, in part, in the building. The cellars were recorded as part of the present project and they appear to have been connected to the vaulted brick undercroft recorded during the evaluation stage, although this relationship was not directly proven. The excavation of footings trenches across the octagonal kitchen demonstrated that the cellars did not extend beneath this structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.165

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0490.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicChild Abuse and TraumaFrench-language works237,207