MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6969083865 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5610971

Acesta cryptadelphe Gagnon, Kenchington, Port, Anstey & Murillo, 2015, sp. nov.

2015· article· en· W6969083865 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeTable (database)Shell (structure)SternumHinge

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acesta cryptadelphe sp. nov. Figs. 2, 3 C–D, 6, 14–16 Material examined. Collection data for each sample set is shown in Table 2. The holotype and three paratypes are from The Gully, off Nova Scotia; nine paratypes are from Beothuk Knoll, off northeast Newfoundland (southwest Flemish Cap), including the tissue from two specimens separated from their respective shell; and two paratypes are from the main basin of Bay d’Espoir, southern Newfoundland (Gagnon & Haedrich 2003). Table 3 summarizes the catalogue/accession information and basic morphological data for each specimen included in the type series. All specimens are deposited in the Mollusc Collection of the Canadian Museum of Nature; five of these were used to extract partial COI gene sequence datasets, which are available on GenBank. Description. Holotype (CMNML 097156): Complete specimen, left valve preserved dry (Fig. 14 A), right valve (posterior margin damaged) and tissue preserved in 70% ethanol; nearly equivalved (see byssal notch below), thin, ovate with narrow hinge region (hinge length to shell width ratio = 0.43; Tab. 3), exterior light beige in colour, with whitish radial ribs in median portion of shell; anterior and posterior radial ribs most prominent, attenuating toward median region, becoming broader and flattened; at least 8–9 major growth lines irregularly interrupting radial ribs. Poorly developed anterior auricle, dorsally delineating lunule; posterior auricle extending from umbo and representing about 83% of hinge length (Tab. 3). Lunule length 3.5 cm, representing 41% of shell length, with weak inward curve. Byssal notch indistinct on left valve with lunule inner margin nearly straight, slightly gapping on right valve, particularly toward the dorsal region of the lunule. Shell moderately inflated with highest inflation point at first third of shell length. Shell interior translucent, glossy, whitish, with weak but demarcated muscle scars in the dorsoposterior region of the shell; pallial line weak. Hinge plate with deep, oblique, V-shape ligament pit extending from shell beak to mid-ventral edge of hinge plate. Hinge line delineating interior edge of hinge plate on either sides of ligament pit, nearly linear; ligament pit extending only slightly ventrally below hinge line; hinge length approx. 32% of shell length; hinge plate approx. 0.5 cm high from beak to hinge line (about 5.2 % of shell length). Umbonal cavity present behind hinge plate. Soft tissue: mantle margin uniform and unfused, without siphon, bordered by short (contracted) tentacles. Foot small with broad, distal sole with deep byssal groove; three byssal threads attached anterodorsally to base of foot. Mouth bordered above and below by short palps, forming wide “lips”; palps not connected to gills. In living animal, soft tissue bright orange in colour, with long tentacles extending from gaping mantle margin (Fig. 2). Character variations within type series: Tables 3 and 6 and Figure 7 present some of the morphometric variations between specimens. Shell thin, almost transparent in smallest specimen (CMNML 0 97162, Fig. 15), whitish to beige, translucent in some intermediate specimens (CMNML 0 97158, Fig. 3 D; CMNML 0 97157.1, Fig.14 B) and thick, opaque with patchy whitish, beige to light brown exterior and white interior in oldest specimens (e.g., CMNML 0 92958, CMNML 097161.1); highest valve inflation point closer to middle of shell length in larger specimens (valve inflation to shell length ratio ranges from 0.15 to 0.26; Fig. 7 E), shell width to length ratio ranges from 0.74 to 0.84. Lunule of variable length relative to shell length with ratios ranging from 0.22 to 0.58 (Fig. 7 C). Byssal notch usually represented by slight gapping of right valve, occasionally on both valves (e.g., CMNML 097157.1). Hinge length to shell length ratio ranges from 0.24 to 0.32; hinge plate height to shell length ratio varies from 0.031 in smallest specimens (e.g., Figs. 14 B, 15B) to 0.102 in older specimens (e.g., Fig. 16 B, D); hinge length to shell-width-ratio ranges from 0.30 to 0.43. Prominence of radial ribs on exterior of valves variable, faint in some specimens (e.g., CMNML 0 97160.2, CMNML 097161.1). The two specimens with well-preserved larval shell from The Gully and Beothuk Knoll (Tab. 5; Fig. 6) display a dome-shaped, subcircular prodissoconch (P1), with a uniform glossy surface; shell type 2D (or 2C?) (Malchus & Sartori 2013). Their lengths vary between 241 and 261 µm. A prodissoconch 2 region could not be clearly identified by light microscopy. Distribution. Only known from the material examined, off Nova Scotia, in The Gully, from 619 to 1241 m, and around Beothuk Knoll, southwest Flemish Cap, from 710 to 888 m, and from Newfoundland in Bay d’Espoir’s Main Basin, from approx. 400 to 785 m. See Figure 1 for map. Etymology. From the terms “crypto”, meaning hidden or concealed, and “adelphe”, meaning sister or sibling, referring to the very similar shell morphology between this northwest Atlantic species and Acesta excavata in the northeast Atlantic. Remarks. There is no DNA information available for the specimens collected by Gagnon & Haedrich (2003) in Bay d’Espoir, Newfoundland. However, according to our shell shape analysis, the specimens cluster with the Beothuk Knoll and The Gully specimens, which plot marginally outside the Acesta excavata cluster suggesting that they share close genetic affinities. The specimens from the Azores also cluster along with the Newfoundland and Nova Scotia specimens in the shell shape analysis, and may also represent A. cryptadelphe sp. nov. Further genetic work on Azorean specimens is required to test that hypothesis. The molecular data indicate that the Acesta species, including A. cryptadelphe sp. nov., each form a monophyletic clade (Figs. 12, 13). The specimens from Newfoundland (Beothuk Knoll) and Nova Scotia (The Gully) have a low genetic divergence (average 0.012) comparable to that of other Acesta species (range 0.003 to 0.012), and with divergence from other Acesta species an order of magnitude greater; ranging from 0.103 (A. mori) to 0.166 (A. sphoni). Habitat and species association. In the northwest Atlantic (Fig. 1), all specimens were found associated with rocky substrates below 400 m water depth, either on isolated outcrops, under overhangs or on rock walls. The first two specimens of giant file clams found in Bay d’Espoir, Newfoundland, were associated with a near-vertical underwater cliff and isolated outcrops at depths ranging from 400 to 800 m (Gagnon & Haedrich 2003). A manned diving excursion with a submersible along two vertical transects of this fjord’s rock walls (Goblin Head; Haedrich & Gagnon 1991) revealed large numbers of Acesta specimens but none of the typical cold-water coral association (i.e., Paragorgia arborea, Primnoa resedaeformis, Lophelia pertusa and Madrepora oculata (Linnaeus), Desmophyllum Ehrenberg. In The Gully, Acesta specimens occur on steep cliffs and other rock surfaces, in association with Desmophyllum dianthus (Esper) (Fig. 2 B), Paramuricea Koelliker, and occasionally in the vicinity of Primnoa resedaeformis (Gunnerus) (Kenchington et al. 2014). Around Beothuk Knoll, Murillo et al. (2011) reported Paragorgia arborea and Desmophyllum dianthus whereas Primnoa resedaeformis and Anthothela grandiflora (M. Sars) are present within Flemish Pass, just north of Beothuk Knoll.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.233

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicMarine Biology and Ecology Research→French-language works237,207→