Bibliographic record
Abstract
Physiomorphus suturalis Pic (Figures 31, 43-44, 55, 69) Physiomorphus suturalis Pic 1920: 16; Pic 1929: 207; Blackwelder 1945: 494. HOLOTYPE, ♀, labelled:`Tijuca (Rio) Bresil E. Gounelle, 12, 1884 /? Cleodaeus ou voisin / Type / TYPE / Phy suturalis Pic’, in MNHN, Pic Coll. (PYTHIDAE). Diagnosis, adult This species may be separated from its congeners by the following diagnostic character: lateral margins of pronotal disc sinuate in anterior half. Description, adult Characters of Physiomorphus, with the following specific features: Body slightly elongate (TL/GEW 2.88), somewhat ovate. Head. Scape relatively short, subglobular; antennomere 2 moniliform, about half length of scape; antennomere 3 sub fi liform; antennomeres 4-10 moniliform; antennomere 11 short, narrowed near midlength, without cleft; distal maxillary palpomere slightly expanded, cultriform; eyes small and widely separated. Pronotum relatively narrow (GPW/PL 1.29); moderately wider than head (GPW/GHW 1.13); lateral margins of disc straight and slightly divergent anteriorly, to near midlength; distinctly sinuate from midlength to anterior margin; discal depressions relatively shallow, indistinctly de fi ned inwardly; punctation relatively deep, coarse, of somewhat irregular shape, not umbilicate; setation sparse. Elytra moderately convex, without suggestions of longitudinal costae; epipleuron traceable to very near apex, gradually and evenly narrowed posteriorly; vestiture sparse, not concealing moderately coarse punctation; sutural margin with setae and punctation slightly denser than on disc; binding patch not conspicuous dorsally. Abdomen. Sexual setae and male genitalia not examined. Colour. Entire body uniformly piceous, legs and mouthparts somewhat lighter; elytral suture slightly lighter in colour than disc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".