Bibliographic record
Abstract
7. Paranemoura perfecta (Walker, 1852) Spotted Forestfly http://lsid.speciesfile.org/urn:lsid: Plecoptera.speciesfile.org:TaxonName:6128 (Figs. 3, 49‒54) Nemoura perfecta Walker 1852:191. Holotype male (British Museum of Natural History), Redman, Nova Scotia, Canada Nemoura punctipennis: Claassen, 1923:291. Syn. Illies, 1966:218 Nemoura punctipennis: Needham & Claassen, 1925:221 Nemoura perfecta: Claassen, 1940:61 Nemoura (Paranemoura) perfecta: Ricker, 1952:41 Paranemoura perfecta: Illies, 1966:218 Nemoura (Paranemoura) perfecta: Harper & Hynes, 1971:1137 Paranemoura perfecta: Zwick, 1973:345 Nemoura (Paranemoura) perfecta: Hitchcock, 1974:103 Paranemoura perfecta: Baumann, 1975:54, 64 (in part), 66 (in part) Paranemoura perfecta: Stewart & Stark, 1988:176 Paranemoura perfecta: Baumann, 1996:818 Paranemoura perfecta: Stark et al., 1998:119 Paranemoura perfecta: Stewart & Stark, 2002:203 Distribution. Canada: NB, NS, ON, PE, PQ. USA: CT, MA, MD, ME, MI, NC, NH, NY, PA, TN, VA, VT, WV (DeWalt et al. 2022) Male. Macropterous. Body length 4.8–5.7 mm, forewing length 5.0– 5.5 mm (n = 11) Gills absent. Cerci simple and unmodified (Figs. 49‒51). Paraprocts undivided and broad, roughly triangular in shape. Epiproct ventral sclerite fully recurved over abdomen (Figs. 49‒50), ca. parallel-sided and longitudinally split into halves for ca. ⅔ length by the dorsal sclerite (Figs. 50‒52), basolateral margins gently rounded and sparsely covered by small spinules, notch lacking (Figs. 49‒50), anteriorly tapered to a narrow, parallel-sided rounded apex (Fig. 52); posteriorly-directed epihooks of dorsal sclerite smooth and acute (Figs. 49‒50). Female. Macropterous. Body length 5.1–6.1 mm, forewing length 5.0– 6.4 mm (n = 8). Gills absent. Cerci simple and unmodified (Figs. 53‒54). The 8 th sternum is medially concave and not produced distally, Y-sclerite open along posterior margin (Figs. 53‒54); 7 th sternum is unsclerotized, with a short rounded medial projection extending ¼‒½ over the 8 th sternum (Figs. 53‒54). Larva. The description by Harper & Hynes (1971) from southern Quebec and partial illustration in Baumann (1975) may refer to P. claasseni. Comments. Paranemoura perfecta overlaps with P. claasseni in the northeastern Nearctic but has a much broader distribution, extending westward across southern Ontario to Michigan’s Upper Peninsula (Grubbs et al. 2012) and southward through the Appalachian Mountains to Tennessee and North Carolina (DeWalt et al. 2022).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.052 | 0.025 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".