MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6969093276 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5626828

Spinitectus carolini Holl 1928

2016· article· en· W6969093276 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcretory systemSpiculeBody cavitySPINE (molecular biology)Muscular system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spinitectus carolini Holl, 1928 Description (after Mueller & Van Cleave 1932, Jilek & Crites 1982a, and Christian 1972). With characteristics of the genus. “Head” region without spines. Four cephalic papillae present. Two amphids each with two pore-like openings situated laterally on pseudolabia (Fig. 66 A). Deirids between 1st and 2nd spine rows. 15 to 20 sharp spines present per row; spines <0.015 long. Anterior rows of spines arranged in 4 sectors. Spines absent over lateral lines, and decreasing in number and size posteriorly. Buccal cavity relatively long, straight and thin-walled. Muscular oesophagus begins at level of 2nd row of spines, and is about half the width of the glandular oesophagus (Fig. 66 B). Males: Body slender 3.31 (2.78–3.45) long, 0.098 (0.087–0.106) wide. Nerve ring 0.145 (0.133–0.151), and excretory pore 0.202 (0.187–0.221) from anterior end. Excretory pore between the 8th and 9th spine rows. Muscular oesophagus 0.172–0.266 long [mean length not given]. Glandular oesophagus 1.403 (1.201–1.497) long. Narrow caudal alae. Four pairs pre-cloacal and five pairs post-cloacal pedunculate papillae present (Fig. 66 C). Right spicule short, proximally expanded, distal tip with large ventral barb [length not reported]. Left spicule long, slender, evenly curved with tail, divided into shaft and flanged blade [length not reported]. Area rugosa present. Females: Body slender 5.13 (4.35–5.70) long, 0.110 (0.105–0.114) wide. Nerve ring 0.152 (0.140–0.156) and excretory pore 0.212 (0.203–0.221) from anterior end. Muscular oesophagus 0.194 (0.168–0.235) long, and glandular oesophagus 1.590 (1.437–1.702) long. Vulva located just posterior to middle of body. Ovijector well developed. Vagina directed posteriorly (Fig. 66 D). Amphidelphic. Eggs thick-shelled. Tail with heart-shaped mucron. Site: intestinal lumen Hosts: Ambloplites rupestris (1, 4, 6, 8); Ameiurus nebulosus (6); Amia calva (11); Coregonus clupeaformis (4); Cyprinus carpio (4); Esox lucius (10); Lepomis gibbosus (1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9); Lepomis macrochirus (8, 9); Micropterus dolomieu (1, 2, 3, 4, 12); Micropterus salmoides (1, 4, 8); Morone americana (9); Morone chrysops (4, 5, 7, 11); Osmerus mordax (4); Perca flavescens (2, 10); Pomoxis nigromaculatus (8); Sander vitreus (4) Distribution: Ontario Records: 1. Bangham & Hunter 1939; 2. Bangham 1941; 3. Bangham & Venard 1946; 4. Bangham 1951; 5. Bangham 1955; 6. Dechtiar 1972a; 7. Anthony 1984; 8. Anthony 1985; 9. Dechtiar & Christie 1988; 10. Dechtiar & Lawrie 1988; 11. Dechtiar et al. 1988; 12. Dechtiar & Nepszy 1988

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1210.053

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.139 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomyFrench-language works237,207