A theoretical study on the detection of dynamic gene regulation in bulk tissue transcriptomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thousands of studies have used co-expression analysis of bulk tissue samples to probe gene regulation. However, the extent that intracellular regulatory signals are present in these data is unclear. Specifically, we lack clarity of the factors that promote or impede the propagation of regulatory signals from the single cell level to the bulk tissue level. To bring these issues into focus, we developed a novel computational simulator, grounded in real data, to explore the theoretical relationship between events in single cells and bulk tissue expression profiles, and clarify the conditions required for the propagation of intracellular regulatory signals in complex tissues such as the brain. Our simulator first generates single cell expression profiles and subsequently samples and aggregates these single cells to produce bulk tissue expression profiles. Using this framework, we found that there are very specific and unlikely conditions under which intracellular dynamic regulatory signals can be propagated to the bulk tissue level. For the most part, such regulatory relationships, however strong at the single cell level, are unlikely to be detectable. Our results provide a quantitative explanation for why regulatory network inference from co-expression has proved challenging - even with the assistance of other data modalities - and gives the scientific community a set of tools to further explore these issues in both single-cell and bulk tissue data. List of Tables in TSV format: Supplementary Table S1. Cell type profiles Supplementary Table S2. Gamma model parameters Supplementary Table S3. Mean-variance trends Supplementary Table S4. Explanatory power of CSIV versus ISV Supplementary Table S5. Effects of dilution Supplementary Table S6. Cell type proportions Supplementary Table S7. Effects of cellular composition variability Supplementary Table S8. Genes modeled in CCV experiments Supplementary Table S9. Co-expression values in CCV experiments Supplementary Table S10. Co-expression values of different scenarios
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".