MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6969107056 · doi:10.5683/sp3/zlzqog

Exposure to pollutants for household cooking and lighting and pediatric post-discharge mortality following a severe infection in Uganda

2025· dataset· en· W6969107056 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene expression and cancer classification
Canadian institutionsCentre for Global Health Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCohortCohort studyPoisson regressionMortality rateRural areaEcological studyEpidemiologyRespiratory infection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Particulate matter from household air pollution (HAP) is linked to half of all lower respiratory infection deaths among children under 5 years of age. In rural Uganda, similar number of children die 6-months post discharge as during hospitalization for severe infections. However, it is unclear whether exposure to HAP contributes to poor health and death after discharge. We investigated the association between cooking and household lighting practices and mortality 6-months post-discharge among children under 5 years of age treated for severe infection in rural Uganda. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from observational cohort studies, conducted between July 2017 to July 2021, among 6,955 children 0 to 5 years admitted to one of six Ugandan hospitals for a severe infectious illness. Clinical signs and symptoms, sociodemographic variables, and mortality up to 6-months post-discharge was collected for all participants, and follow-up rates were >95%. Exposure variables included type of cooking fuel used, location of cooking (e.g. indoors, outdoors), and primary source of household lighting. We assessed post-discharge mortality using simple and multivariate Poisson regression. Results: The unadjusted risk ratio of 6-month post-discharge mortality by dual or single exposure to pollutant fuel sources for cooking indoors and household lighting, when compared to minimal exposure, was 1.57 (95%CI 1.17, 2.11) and 1.20 (95%CI 0.94, 1.54), respectively. Adjusting for age, sex, distance to hospital, maternal education, and maternal HIV status, the adjusted risk ratios for dual and single exposure became 1.30 (95%CI 0.96, 1.76] and 1.08 (95%CI 0.84, 1.38). There was no significant interaction between exposure and age, sex, maternal education, or anemia status. Results: This analysis did not find a statistically significant association between HAP and 6-month post-discharge mortality. However, HAP cannot be ruled out as a contributor in this population where malnutrition, comorbidities and sociodemographic vulnerabilities are common. Data Collection Methods: All data were collected at the point of care using encrypted study tablets and these data were then uploaded to a Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) database hosted at the BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute (Vancouver, Canada). At admission, trained study nurses systematically collected data on clinical, social and demographic variables. Following discharge, field officers contacted caregivers at 2 and 4 months by phone, and in-person at 6 months, to determine vital status, post-discharge health-seeking, and readmission details. Verbal autopsies were conducted for children who had died following discharge. Data Processing Methods: A proxy exposure variable was created to classify whether each participant was exposed to a pollutant fuel source. This was stratified into three exposure levels. Ethics Declaration: These studies were approved by the Mbarara University of Science and Technology Research Ethics Committee (15/10–16, 27-Jan-2017), and the University of British Columbia–Children and Women’s Health Centre of British Columbia Research Ethics Board (H16–02679, 09-May-2017). Study Protocol & Supplementary Materials: Smart Discharges to improve post-discharge health outcomes in children: A prospective before-after study with staggered implementation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→Same topicGene expression and cancer classification→French-language works237,207→