MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6969110934 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6522469

Tribochrysa firmata Scudder 1890

2022· article· en· W6969110934 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFossil Insects in Amber
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityRoyal British Columbia Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChrysopidaeType localityDorsumNeuropteraType (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tribochrysa firmata Scudder, 1890 Figs 24–28 Tribochrysa firmata Scudder, 1890: 169, 171, 172, Pl. 14, Figs 6, 7, 10, 11; Scudder 1891: 380; Handlirsch 1906–1908 [1907]: 909; Carpenter 1935: 267, Fig. 2 [inadvertently transposed as Fig. 7]; Adams 1967: 232; Schlüter 1982: 261; Schlüter, 1984: 4; Martins-Neto & Vulcano 1989: 189, 190; Séméria & Nel 1990: 31; Willmann 1993: 244; Meyer 2003: 208; Nel et al. 2005: 67; Makarkin & Archibald 2013: 143; Archibald & Makarkin 2015: 361. Paleochrysa fracta (non Cockerell, 1914): Adams 1957: 71. Type material. Lectotype (designated here): MCZ 241 (Scudder’s no. 670). A complete specimen preserved in dorsal aspect; left wings crumpled. Verbatim label data [typed]: (1) “Mus. Comparative Zoölogy, Cambridge / No. 241/ Tribochrysa firmata Scud / Florissant Miocene”; (2) [handwritten]: “ 241 type Tribochrysa firmata Scud. / Florissant / Neuroptera: Chrysopidae ”. The specimen has black ink writing on the rock that says “Scud. no. 670 / 241”, and a red paper label glued to the rock that says “Type.”. Paralectotype (designated here): MCZ 4127 (Scudder’s no. 8792). An almost complete specimen in ventral aspect; right wings crumpled. Verbatim label data [typed and handwritten]: “(1) “Mus. Comp. Zoöl. Cambridge, Mass. / No. 4127 / Tribochrysa firmata / Scud. / Florissant”; (2) [handwritten]: “4127 type Tribochrysa firmata Scud. / Florissant / Neuroptera ”. The specimen has red ink writing on the rock that says “8792.”, and a red paper label glued to the rock that says “Type. 4127”. Both fossils are coated with Canada balsam. Type locality and horizon. USA: Colorado: Teller County: Florissant (precise collecting locality unknown); Eocene, late Priabonian; Florissant Formation. Diagnosis. See diagnosis for Tribochrysa inaequalis. Redescription. Lectotype MCZ 241 (Figs 24, 25). Head transverse in dorsal view; eye ca. 0.4 mm in diameter. Antennae thin, shorter than forewing (9.3 mm long); scapus enlarged, cone-shaped. Thorax, legs, abdomen poorly preserved. Forewing 11 mm long, 3.8 mm wide (length to width ratio 2.89). Costal space relatively narrow. Subcostal veinlets simple proximad pterostigmal region, widely spaced. Pterostigma indistinct. Distal part of Sc not discernible. Subcostal space narrow; subcostal crossveins not preserved. RA long, ending on margin slightly proximad wing apex. RA with eight crossveins. RP originating relatively far from wing base (at ca. 0.27 complete length). Anterior trace of RP zigzagged, forked distally; with eight branches, five proximal forked, three distal simple. Basal crossvein between RP, M (1r-m) rather long, connecting anterior trace of RP, MA within im at nearly one-third length. M appears fused with R basally; sigmoid proximad fork; dividing to MA, MP slightly distad level of origin of RP. MA, MP strongly curved; MA rather shallowly forked distad Psc; MP deeply forked at Psc. Crossvein between MA, MP (1im) rather long. Im elongate, slightly divergent distally (length/width 3.42). Psm poorly developed, strongly zigzagged. Crossvein 2m-cu very long, connecting im, CuA at nearly proximal one-fifths im length. CuA probably with three simple branches. Psc rather into well developed, slightly zigzagged. CuP deeply forked. Crossvein 2icu connecting CuA, anterior branch of CuP opposite 2m-cu. 1c: 2c length ratio 0.35:1. A1, A2 simple. Two gradate series of crossveins: inner series arranged in strongly broken line, with eight crossveins distad MA; outer series arranged in almost smooth line with eight crossveins distad RP1. Hind wing ca. 10 mm long, ca. 3.4 mm wide. Costal space narrow. Subcostal veinlets simple proximad pterostigmal region, very widely spaced. Sc poorly preserved distally. Subcostal space very narrow; crossveins not discernible. Pterostigma indistinct. RA ending on margin near wing apex. RA with eight crossveins. Anterior trace of RP zigzagged; with eight branches (six proximal forked, two distal simple). Psm rather well developed. MA basally crossvein-like, then fused with RP for long distance, then strongly zigzagged, deeply forked distad Psc. MP nearly straight proximad fusion with CuA, then slightly zigzagged, deeply forked at Psc. Proximal crossvein between MA, MP (1im) long. CuA pectinate, fused with MP for rather short distance; with three simple branches proximad fusion. CuP simple. Crossvein 1cu long. A1, A2 simple. Two gradate series of crossveins: inner series arranged in strongly broken line, with seven crossveins distad MA; outer series arranged in smooth line with seven crossveins distad RP1. Paralectotype MCZ 4127 (Figs 26–28). Male (?). Body 7 mm long. Head very poorly preserved, eye ca. 0.3 mm in diameter. Antennae thin, 6.3 mm as preserved; scapus enlarged, cone-shaped. Thorax poorly preserved. Legs not preserved. Abdomen: presumable S8+9 well preserved, short (in ventral view) (Fig. 26). Forewing ca. 8.5 mm long, ca. 3.2 mm wide (length to width ratio 2.66). Costal space relatively narrow. Subcostal veinlets simple proximad pterostigmal region, widely spaced. Pterostigma indistinct. Distal part of Sc not discernible. Subcostal space narrow; crossveins not preserved. RA ending on margin near wing apex. RA with eight crossveins. RP originating far from wing base (at ca. 0.29 complete length). Anterior trace of RP zigzagged; with eight branches, six proximal forked, two distal simple. Basal crossvein between RP, M (1r-m) long, connecting anterior trace of RP, MA within im at ca. proximal one-fifths of its length. M dividing to MA, MP distad level of origin of RP. MA, MP strongly curved; MP deeply forked at Psc. Crossvein between MA, MP (1im) rather long. Im elongate, markedly divergent distally (length/width ratio 4.35). Psm poorly developed, strongly zigzagged. Crossvein 2m-cu very long, connecting im, CuA at ca. proximal one-twelfths im length. CuA probably with three simple branches. Psc well developed, slightly zigzagged distally. CuP deeply forked. Crossvein 2icu connecting CuA, anterior branch of CuP slightly proximad 2m-cu. CuA, A1 closely approaching for short distance. A1, A2 simple. Crossvein between A1, A2 rather long. Two gradate series of crossveins: inner series arranged in strongly broken line, with eight crossveins distad MA; outer series arranged in smooth line, with seven crossveins distad RP1. Hind wing ca. 7.5 mm long, ca. 2.7 mm wide. Costal space, subcostal veinlets poorly preserved. Subcostal spaces narrow, crossveins not discernible. Pterostigma indistinct. RA ending on margin at nearly wing apex. RA space with eight crossveins. Anterior trace of RP zigzagged; with eight branches (five proximal forked, three distal simple). Psm rather well developed. MA basally oblique, crossvein-like, then fused with RP for long distance, then strongly zigzagged, deeply forked distad Psc. MP straight proximad fusion with CuA, then slightly zigzagged, deeply forked at Psc. Proximal crossvein between MA, MP (1im) long. CuA pectinate, fused with MP for rather long distance; with three simple branches proximad fusion. Cu, A1 incompletely preserved, simple. Two gradate series of crossveins: inner series arranged in strongly broken line, with seven crossveins distad MA; outer series arranged in smooth line with seven crossveins distad RP1. Remarks. The species was described from two specimens, both labelled “type” in the collections of MCZ. We designate MCZ 241 as the lectotype as its wings are better preserved. The paralectotype differs from the lectotype by its narrower forewing, the clearly distally dilated intramedian cell, and the presence of an additional crossvein between the gradate series in the forewing (see Fig. 28). It’s possible that these differences are specific.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.332
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1570.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFossil Insects in AmberFrench-language works237,207