Ypopteron nicola Archibald & Gu & Mathewes 2022, new species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ypopteron nicola new species (Fig. 4) Haglidae, Prophalangopsinae sp.: Archibald and Mathewes 2000: 1443, Fig. 3. Diagnosis. As for genus. Description. Holotype tegmen. As in diagnosis and: about 6.5 cm long as preserved (small portion of basalmost region missing); membrane apparently infuscate throughout; RA, RP branch distal branching of MA, MP; RP branching eight times, one branch branched again near margin; MA, MP branch at level of CuA joining CuPaα, distally parallel with branches of RP; CuA+CuPaα with five branches preserved, probably total; no stridulatory file detected on CuPb; simple crossveins throughout proximal posterior portion; zigzag intercalated crossveins forming pentagons in apical portion of overlapping wing between branches of RP. Type specimen. Holotype. Q-1010, part (no counterpart), two or more wings, two almost perfectly overlapping. The anterior regions (RA, stem of RP, ScA, SCP and precostal region) are missing or covered by portions of one or more wing(s); labelled Ypopteron nicola Archibald, Gu, and Mathewes, holotype; collected by Jurgen Mathewes, 1989; deposited in the collections of Simon Fraser University. Locality and age. Quilchena, British Columbia; Coldwater Beds; mid Ypresian, 51.5 ± 0.4 Ma. old. Etymology. The specific epithet refers to the Nicola Valley, where the Quilchena locality is located.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.161 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".